Monday, April 13, 2015

Walker repeatedly politicked on taxpayer-paid trip Sunday

Remember, he's on a taxpayer-paid 'trade mission,' and announced he was taking no political staff with him, but this sure looks political to me:

5 comments:

my5cents said...

Hillary announcing she's running sure lite a fire under SKW. I thought he was on a trade mission. Shouldn't he be concentrating on that. Plenty of time to make comments about Hillary after he gets back. In addition, I have news for SKW, we don't want big, bold ideas that wreck our economy and hurt people. We want sensible, steady as you go, ideas that keep things running smoothly with everyone paying their fair share. Mr. Big and Bold doesn't know what he's talking about.

Anonymous said...

Scott Walker's ideas can only be considered as "big" and "bold" because he is such a tiny petty man, they seem big by comparison and they are only bold because no one else is stupid enough to think you can make political hay by destroying the economy.

Anonymous said...

Yes, Walker talks about Big and Bold, but if you ask him what that means, he doesn't know. I keep wondering why he wants to be president. I think he just wants his name in the list of the presidents in the history books. And that's it. He doesn't really have any desire to do good with the power that comes with the position. He doesn't want to make anyone's life better but his own.

Anonymous said...

"Washington-knows-best" isn't going to work unless he can prove that Walker knows anything at all about the economy. He must be trying out different sound bites depicting Clinton as a Washington insider. Why bother when she obviously is and it hasn't hurt her popularity? Karl Rove and Dick Cheney are working over- time to prove that absolutely anyone can become POTUS with enough money.

Anonymous said...

"Yes, Walker talks about Big and Bold, but if you ask him what that means, he doesn't know...."

That's because he always speaks in the abstract, never in concrete terms. Freedom, bold reforms, "it" is working--those are abstractions. It is a shame that Wisconsin reporters have never noticed this feature of his rhetorical style.

But it is there, for all to see.