Sunday, December 9, 2018

The WI GOP's power grab talking points are getting loopier

Do you remember those vintage "Chatty Cathy" dolls that spoke some sentences if you pulled a cord on the back,
dek
and do you remember how garbled the sentences became when the doll's sound mechanism began to fail? 

Something like 'Cathy has a new blue dress' could become 'Tacky is eew boo derp,’ or sounds to that effect.

It appears as if something like that is happening to Robin Vos, the GOP Speaker of the Wisconsin Assembly, who has been talking a lot about the power grab bill he and his allies have rushed to outgoing GOP Gov. Walker's desk after Walker's stunning 30,000+ vote loss to Democrat Tony Evers.


And when offering up one of the GOP's talking point justifications for the bill to The New York Times last week, Vos came up with these words: 
“If you took Madison and Milwaukee out of the state election formula, we would have a clear majority,” he said. 
Now that, of course, is pure nonsense. It was word salad that went bad. 

It'd be like someone calling Chicago sports talk radio and saying, 'If you took Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers out of the record books, the Bears would have a clear majority' of wins between the two teams.

Or, ‘If you took Madison and Milwaukee out of the state population formula, Wisconsin would be without its two biggest revenue donors. And its biggest economic, cultural, financial, educational, commercial and transportation centers.’

Which would leave Vos and fellow election nullifier Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald managing a smaller, poorer, less interesting, less forward-looking, less attractive state with a much-reduced flow of state income tax collections, vital federal funding based on population and at least two fewer Congressional seats and electoral votes.

So...sorry, Mr. Speaker. You have been able to pack partisan votes into legislative districts which have given your party artificially-lopsided majorities, but somehow erasing Madison and Milwaukee voters from the rolls and the cities from the map would be an impossible end run around various, um, Constitutions.

But keep up these attacks on foundational rights and our big cities, and you make Minnesota look even more attractive as the upper Midwestern destination of choice for people looking to live, work, invest, participate in democracy, and send the kids to college.

2 comments:

Luanne Peterson said...

I’m thinking Minnesota would be a good location for retirement!

xoff said...

Without Milwaukee, Wisconsin would be Iowa, John Norquist used to say. Without Milwaukee and Madison, what would it be?