Sunday, December 25, 2016

Team Walker missed deleting a WI DNR climate change page.

I have documented in this summary posting the scrubbing or wholesale deletion of webpages about climate change from Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources internet sites since Scott Walker began his intention devastation of the agency's science and public resources mission with the "chamber of commerce mentality" he put in charge in 2011.

Even deleted: a link to the UW's major climate change initiative site here; the link was once available on a now-greatly sanitized remaining DNR webpage where the words "climate" and "climate change" do not appear.


But I notice one remaining WI DNR site which dares uses the now-verboten term "climate change," offers a detailed and relevant discussion, and even links to an interactive website put up by the US EPA that Walker and associates love to hate, so I am copying the DNR page text in full below (note the already dead links at the two tabs about emissions) before someone at the DNR hits the delete button:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Waste and materials management - the climate change connection

Global climate change poses serious threats to public health, to the economies of the United States and Wisconsin and to the natural environment. We now have a clearer understanding of the role waste and materials management plays in global climate change and, most importantly, the opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the waste and materials management sphere.
Landfills produce large amounts of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas created by decomposing organic materials. Methane has a global warming potential at least 20 times greater than carbon dioxide, a less potent greenhouse gas. In the United States, landfills produce 23 percent of all methane generated by human-related sources.
Before a product even reaches the landfill, it has already created a considerable amount of greenhouse gases. Extracting raw materials, manufacturing and distribution of products all use energy and produce greenhouse gas emissions. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates 42 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions result from provision of goods and food.
The easiest way to cut down on these emissions? Reduce the number of products you purchase and use, reuse things that are still in good condition and recycle what is no longer usable. Did you know that Wisconsinites currently throw away more than $100 million worth of recyclables in a typical year? Imagine the economic benefit to our state if we recycled everything we could!
There are many ways to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from our landfills. But before a product or material even makes it to the trash can, it has already produced substantial greenhouse gas emissions. Consider an aluminum can. To make that can, aluminum ore was mined, shipped, refined, smelted, rolled and formed. The finished can then traveled to a beverage maker, where it was filled, sealed and labeled; and eventually made its way to a distributor, then retailer, then into our homes.
Each step of this life cycle required energy—in the case of aluminum production, very substantial amounts of energy—and produced greenhouse gas emissions. The same pattern holds true for every other product and material we use. Manufacturing, distribution and consumption all use energy and create greenhouse gas emissions.
The energy required to create a new product can either be partially saved through recycling or reuse or wasted through disposal. If the aluminum can in the above example is thrown away, the energy used in every step of its creation is lost. A new can, requiring new energy expenditures, will need to be made from scratch. Conversely, if the can is recycled, a new can may be made with recycled materials, thereby cutting out much of the production and energy needed to make a new can from virgin materials. For aluminum, that energy savings adds up to about 95 percent of the initial energy requirement, meaning that creating a new can from recycled materials only takes 5 percent of the energy required to make a new can from virgin materials.
Although aluminum has particularly large energy savings compared to other materials, recycling saves energy, no matter what the material. The EPA chart below shows energy savings from recycling for a variety of materials.
Graph showing energy savings per ton recycled
Energy Savings Per Ton Recycled* (Million Btu)

Reduce, reuse, recycle

Recycling materials not only saves energy, it also cuts down on the amount of greenhouse gases produced. The EPA has developed a calculator [exit DNR] to determine what amount of greenhouse gas emissions are prevented from recycling a given product.
Besides energy requirements, the EPA calculator also considers landfill gas emissions and "carbon sequestration" by trees. If trees are left standing rather than being cut down, those trees remove and "sequester," or withhold, carbon dioxide from the air, thereby reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that enters the atmosphere. In other words, reducing paper use and recycling used paper not only saves much of the energy required to harvest, transport, digest and convert wood to paper, it also helps preserves the carbon sequestration capacity of the forest.
Besides energy requirements, the EPA calculator also considers landfill gas emissions and "carbon sequestration" by trees. If trees are left standing rather than being cut down, those trees remove and "sequester," or withhold, carbon dioxide from the air, thereby reducing the amount of carbon dioxide that enters the atmosphere. In other words, reducing paper use and recycling used paper not only saves much of the energy required to harvest, transport, digest and convert wood to paper, it also helps preserves the carbon sequestration capacity of the forest.
Even more greenhouse gas emissions can be prevented through reuse of products. Wisconsin's new electronics recycling law is boosting recovery of used electronics for recycling, refurbishing and reuse. The EPA estimates that recycling a personal computer saves more than double its weight in greenhouse gas emissions, while reusing the same computer, which avoids the production of a new computer, saves more than 50 times its weight in emissions.
The bottom line: reducing the amount of materials and products we use, reusing products that are still functional and recycling materials instead of landfilling them saves tremendous amounts of energy and dramatically reduces greenhouse gas emissions.

No comments: