Foxconn water bid gets more backers, slowed court calendar

Site preparation for the Foxconn project has work orders and schedules, but legal proceedings over its bid for a Lake Michigan water supply have a separate ebb and flow.

I'd summarized about two weeks ago some of the objections raised by several jurisdictions and petitioners to various aspects of the Foxconn project.

A Wisconsin administrative law judge had established a schedule for the filing of briefs in one of those pending matters - - a case brought by multiple petitioners opposing the DNR's approval of a diversion from Lake Michigan 

to supply millions of gallons of water daily for Foxconn manufacturing at its Village of Mount Pleasant site. 

However, additional parties intervened in support of the diversion, so the judge on November 14th issued an amended order extending deadlines for the filing pf briefs - - written arguments, as it were.

The extension is not particularly lengthy, but it illustrates the fluidity of complex and unresolved land, air, water and legal issues facing the company and government regulators while site preparation for the state's most heavily-subsidized private-sector project continues unabated. 

A project which out-going Wisconsin Governor and lead Foxconn booster was touting on his official Twitter account as recently as Monday with a link to this photo essay and story and this Tweet:

 “Aerial view of Foxconn contractors preparing land for more buildings” 

An archive of more than 250 posts about Foxconn is here.

So here is the heart of the judge's order stretching out the schedule for the filing of briefs for and against the diversion: 

STIPULATIONS

1. The Village and County filed a Motion to Intervene via U.S. Mail on October 11, 2018.The parties did not object to the Village and County becoming parties to this action, and the Administrative Law Judge granted their admission as parties.
2. The Petitioners advised they will provide additional facts.
3. The parties agreed that this action can proceed through summary judgment briefing.
4. The Petitioners requested an extension to submit their reply brief due to the addition of four more parties to this action. The Administrative Law Judge granted this extension, and the parties agreed upon an amended scheduling order.
5. The Department agreed to publish the amended scheduling order on the DNR website so interested Amicus parties are aware of the new deadline to file their briefs. 

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

Based upon the representations of the parties, the following schedule has been amended as follows:

1. In this order, whenever the term "filed" is used, it shall be understood that this means received by mail, facsimile, or email by the Division and all other parties listed above.
2. Any party wishing to participate as an amicus shall file a motion to the Administrative Law Judge by November 15, 2018, requesting leave to file an amicus brief.
   
   1. Petitioners shall file their Summary Judgment Motion Brief by December 17, 2018.
   2. The Department and all other parties shall file their Response Brief by January 31, 2019.
   3. Petitioners shall file their Reply Brief by March 4, 2019.
   4. Any Amici allowed to file a brief shall file their brief by March 4, 2019.
   5. The parties reserve the right to request permission from the Administrative Law Judge to file a sur-reply to any Amicus brief that raises an issue not previously addressed in a brief submitted by the Department or Petitioners. Any request will be filed, with a copy of the sur-reply, by March 22, 2019.