Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Anti-Science Republicans Shrug Off Rising Greenhouse Gas Readings

Science?

GOP talking points on greenhouse gases say otherwise.

For Boehner, the issue, as defined by Dr. Limbaugh, is laughable.

Another leading Republican cites God's promise to Noah.

Yeah, science.

5 comments:

Anon Jim said...

Speaking of laughable - go try and sell your global warming tripe in England right now.

They would probably tar & feather you.

James Rowen said...

I know that you know that serious people recognize climate change for what it is. The earth is warming, but a serious consequence is more severe storm events year-round.

Pakistan, LA, and Europe, too.

Anon Jim said...

Serious people (who are not gullible) recognize climate change for what it is - a natural phenomenon for which human activity is insignificant.

What is amazing is that you Chicken Littles somehow think the climate is suppose to be static.

James Rowen said...

So the scientist about which the linked article was written was not serious person?

His entire career doesn't match up to your facility with adiectives?

Try again.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/science/earth/22carbon.html?_r=1&hpw

Anonymous said...

Anyone who is able to read a map should be able to figure out why snowy weather in England doesn't disprove warming simply by looking at this image: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2010&month_last=11&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=11&year1=2010&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg