Anti-Science Republicans Shrug Off Rising Greenhouse Gas Readings
Science?
GOP talking points on greenhouse gases say otherwise.
For Boehner, the issue, as defined by Dr. Limbaugh, is laughable.
Another leading Republican cites God's promise to Noah.
Yeah, science.
5 comments:
Speaking of laughable - go try and sell your global warming tripe in England right now.
They would probably tar & feather you.
I know that you know that serious people recognize climate change for what it is. The earth is warming, but a serious consequence is more severe storm events year-round.
Pakistan, LA, and Europe, too.
Serious people (who are not gullible) recognize climate change for what it is - a natural phenomenon for which human activity is insignificant.
What is amazing is that you Chicken Littles somehow think the climate is suppose to be static.
So the scientist about which the linked article was written was not serious person?
His entire career doesn't match up to your facility with adiectives?
Try again.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/22/science/earth/22carbon.html?_r=1&hpw
Anyone who is able to read a map should be able to figure out why snowy weather in England doesn't disprove warming simply by looking at this image: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/do_nmap.py?year_last=2010&month_last=11&sat=4&sst=1&type=anoms&mean_gen=11&year1=2010&year2=2010&base1=1951&base2=1980&radius=1200&pol=reg
Post a Comment