Michigan tilts water access to wealth
Michigan shows favoritism to wealth when it comes to allocating Great Lakes water.
* The state is considering a 167% increase to the millions of gallons of water it already allows the Nestle conglomerate to withdraw for sale from the Great Lakes watershed - - water the company is allowed to truck out in bottles holding up to 5.7 gallons without limitations through a protectionist loophole in diversion prohibitions Michigan negotiated for into the Great Lakes Compact.
I'd written about the loophole as far back as February 5, 2007.
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vnunbTniFod1PpcGr8qvsKpjCvMfR0svwW51MLmV70u8Afc81Tdj6gz9gipNfqJCCc0nB7Ua-DPGZZ0fjIca6lfFYCCzLCzPXal98HchdtCrEqUn8kWE9LcbHOzOZK1-LAlrIIC4t-Cu-viuaAdAvDttqFPBYEFj4siEvpL1WK7zfyPH18MU6PQRd4r5553VFqvxYVKPnsKgr2F0uSl7rCa2RJTGeH9FMZILag=s0-d)
* Michigan also voted along with the other Great Lakes states except Minnesota to allow a controversial first-ever-out-of-basin Great Lakes water diversion to the relatively affluent City of Waukesha, Wisconsin through a different diversion exemption in the agreement so the city could soon shift away from using well water tainted with naturally-occurring radium.
Yet residents in the far poorer and more heavily African-American City of Flint, Michigan still cannot turn on their spigots and receive clean, safe drinking water.
Where is the equity?
* The state is considering a 167% increase to the millions of gallons of water it already allows the Nestle conglomerate to withdraw for sale from the Great Lakes watershed - - water the company is allowed to truck out in bottles holding up to 5.7 gallons without limitations through a protectionist loophole in diversion prohibitions Michigan negotiated for into the Great Lakes Compact.
I'd written about the loophole as far back as February 5, 2007.
* Michigan also voted along with the other Great Lakes states except Minnesota to allow a controversial first-ever-out-of-basin Great Lakes water diversion to the relatively affluent City of Waukesha, Wisconsin through a different diversion exemption in the agreement so the city could soon shift away from using well water tainted with naturally-occurring radium.
Yet residents in the far poorer and more heavily African-American City of Flint, Michigan still cannot turn on their spigots and receive clean, safe drinking water.
Where is the equity?
No comments:
Post a Comment