The Political Environment: If Voter ID Is "Settled," Why Are Four Lawsuits Challenging It?

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Water Lily said...: I'll make the same comment I made yesterday in response to the JS Op Ed by Walker, who writes:

“While a vocal minority may disagree with our common-sense policy position, that doesn't change the fact that the temporary injunction issued by the Dane County Circuit Court will be overturned by a higher court, and ultimately the voter ID law will be upheld.”

Higher court as in, say, State Supreme Court, with whom you’ve already had conversations? And that’s how you say you can KNOW (it’s a fact, you just said so) the injunction will be overturned and ultimately upheld?

This one's a real laugher:
“The time has come to accept the fact that I worked hard to lawfully and constitutionally implement a law that I campaigned on and to move on.”

Will you accept the fact that Wisconsinites worked hard to lawfully and constitutionally to oppose the mining law that was defeated Tuesday? Will you accept the vote of the Wisconsin State Legislature and the will of the people of Wisconsin and will YOU move on?; March 9, 2012 at 11:41 PM