Wednesday, November 14, 2012

East Coasters Might Want A Word With John Boehner

Even as Hurricane Sandy cleanup continues, the House leader says he has no interest in fighting climate changes:

Mr. Boehner’s words, which appear to mischaracterize the scientific debate on global warming, indicate that blinkered Republican opposition to doing much of anything about the problem may persist.

8 comments:

Reagan's Disciple said...

Doing nothing about what "problem?"

Didn't temperatures peak in about '98?

Reagan's Disciple said...

In case anyone was wondering.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

Didn't temperatures peak in about '98?

No.


But your dedication to denial is truly impressive.

Reagan's Disciple said...

See the above link and please don't let the facts get in the way of your opinion.

Sorry to make you look so foolish again.

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

See my link and don't let the facts get in the way of YOUR opinion.

Seriously, you cite the DAILY MAIL? LOL. Meanwhile, my link actually goes to the scientific center producing the data.

Besides, David Rose's article was "pre-bunked":

http://www.skepticalscience.com/misleading-daily-mail-prebunked-nuccitelli-et-al-2012.html

You make yourself look foolish enough and don't actually need much help from me.

Reagan's Disciple said...

And you are quoting a Global warming anti-skepticism website. Talk about a hypocritical comment about sources...

https://www2.ucar.edu/sites/default/files/news/2011/noaa_globaltemp_2010.jpg

and another...

http://www.drroyspencer.com/2009/04/some-global-warming-qa-to-consider-in-light-of-the-epa-ruling/

NOAA.. Looks like it is 98 or maybe 2005 to me.

Global warming kooks sure have a tough time explaining 1940-80 as well. One of the bigger industrial periods in the world, unregulated global pollution and still the temps are lower or scattered at best.

Were you born in the 70s when the educators were telling us to watch out for the coming ice age... after all, it was based on science.

BTW - I personally hope it does get warmer.

Perhaps you can rely on Snopes.com or maybe even Politifact for your next source.

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

Yeah, your first link goes an unexplained chart with no data that kind of indicates a WARMING TREND.

And Roy Spencer? LMFAO:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Roy_Spencer

The Skeptical Science site actual uses data, and all that sciencey stuff, to debunk the crazies like Roy Spencer and the Daily Mail crap.

I know you'll just scoff at the RationalWIki link, but when your rebuttals are links to tabloids or ID cranks like Spencer, You really aren't helping your case here. Perhaps you should move on. There's a post about Charlie Sykes up higher!

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

Perhaps you can rely on Snopes.com or maybe even Politifact for your next source.


...says the guy who linked to a DAILY MAIL article.