Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Gun Votes A Defeat For Obama? Wrong Conclusion

This is a defeat for people.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Perhaps you should learn how to write a blog. There is nothing here which transmits any information that a person could respond to unless they are clairvoyant.

Jake formerly of the LP said...

Only in Baggerland is James' point confusing.

Anonymous said...

james points are frequently absent-to-non-exisant and most often, links featuring his headlines are a waste of time.

atrios carved a niche out for himself at eschaton by being minimalistic to the extreme -- but atrios isn't an inside pundit that props up the lie of "balanced" journalism either.

it isn't just baggerland -- its an objective fact that many posts here are not worth clicking on. It is also a fact that rowan (misspelled on purpose) is the first to jump on others for proofreading-failures, yet his analysis is always off mark -- it misses the larger point.

Media disinformation is responsible for almost all posted here, yet media insider does not have the courage to point it out.

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

I love anonymous comments on blogging incorrectly.

It's moderately more amusing than the anonymous media-purist harangues.

Hey, Nonnie Mouse, blogs are for free! start one of your own, and you can show JR how to do it.

Same goes for the media-obsession troll. As Jello Biafra said, "..BECOME the media!" Give it a shot, Bunky.

Famous Blogger said...

I found this blog to be just right. Hey 7:42- try reading a few more blogs on here. Try some exploring of JR's mining blogs or his water blogs. Tell me - is there a book on writing blogs?

enoughalready said...

The failure to pass universal background checks ranks right up there with the failure to hold Wall Street accountable. I am afraid that neither one says very much about the state of our nation and the health of our democracy.

Anonymous said...

So what is it that you don't understand about the second amendment?

zombie rotten mcdonald said...

I don't understand the "Well-Regulated" part. To me, that means regulations covering weapons are A-OK; apparently to you, that means....nothing.