Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Howard Fuller v. Glenn Grothman On State Subsidizing Rich Choice Families

Fuller says no, Grothman says yes, because it resolves a "marriage penalty."

Or, shall we say, creates a new entitlement for those already entitled?

Advantage, Fuller.

And check out this account of Grothman's disinterested, then bullying behavior at an earlier budget hearing.

No comments: