Will influential Walker Backers Now Say "Enough is Enough?"

To the editorial boards and moderate Republicans who said Scott Walker was the right choice for Wisconsin, a question:

When will Walker damage enough of the programs and goals you have backed for you to withdraw that support?

If it wasn't derailing federally-constructed Amtrak service from Milwaukee to Madison, if it wasn't jeopardizing the nascent wind turbine industry, if it wasn't shifting the biomass generating plant in Madison back to fossil fuels, if it wasn't pushing a private bill for a donor to fill a Green Bay wetlands, if it isn't grabbing off rule-making authority from the legislature - - is Walker's undoing the popular Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Fund program the tipping point?

Is there an overreach anywhere in this radical performance by a governor elected with just 52% of the vote that gives you genuine pause about where Walker and his extreme team are taking the state?

Do you have the commitment and consistency to come out and say, "enough is enough?"

The Stewardship Fund is about as bi-partisan, non-partisan and broadly popular a state-branded program we have. Urban, rural,and suburban people use and enjoy it, as do hikers, hunters and anglers.

Are you willing to watch the public interest in Wisconsin get the Grover Norquist--shrink-and drown-in-the-bathtub arch-reactionary treatment?

Is nothing worth preserving here?