UN Right To Fix Climate Data Errors
Better fact-checking, vetting is good science, and politics, too,
But then leaping to exaggerated claims against the basic conclusion that climate change is real - - as the Right and their corporate underwriters are bound to do - - is bad politics and anti-science.
3 comments:
What is it called when the data gathered doesn't support the hypothesis and the outcome is altered to make it look like the hypothesis is proven correct???
James - in case you missed it . . .
Your buddy Phil Jones of the U. of East Anglia CRU and Climategate fame has conceded that there has been no “statistically significant” rise in temperatures since 1995.
The Great Climate Change Retreat
Doh!
Wow - looks like losing Phil Jones has brought the GW/CC/WTFYWCI posts to a standstill.
Post a Comment