Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Climate Scientists Want The Skeptics To Control Themselves

Their plea will probably gin up the deniers, like the well-known naturalist Rush Limbaugh.

6 comments:

Anon Jim said...

Considering the tactics (including the destroying of careers of anyone who questions your claims) that have been used over the last decade by the proponents of Anthropogenic Global Warming (then “Climate Change” once the GW term became to much of an embarrassment to use), including the mixing of politics with selective or incomplete science, against those who are skeptical of there being any significance to the activities of man on climate, I find this "plea" downright laughable.

The best quote from the article is “Let’s have a debate about the science”. That is the last thing your side has wanted. Prophet Gore (or should that be “Profitor”) led that charge with his constant ‘this is settled science” mantra and his refusal (and inability) to debate any aspect of his idiotic claims.

When you feel the need to constantly use the snarky term "denier" - as if we are in the same league as despicable holocaust deniers – your whining now when your image gets bloodied a little is pathetic.

Don’t play politics if you are not prepared for political backwash.

Oh and why is it, once again, the scientists the media contacts for these climate articles are never Climatologists?

SOM/BFTG

James Rowen said...

Can you please explain what SOM/BFTG stands for?

Anon Jim said...

That signoff acronym is just my personal motto, which I use as a web search identifier.

If you would prefer I not include on the PE, just say so.

James Rowen said...

I'd prefer you say what it means, but if you choose not to, then drop it, as it raises a question only you can answer.

Anon Jim said...

Guess I will drop it, as I would prefer to have personal also mean private.

Kinda like your viewpoint on AM620 WTMJ and Charlie Sykes' involvement in promoting the Honor Flights.

James Rowen said...

No one is forcing you to comment on this blog.