The WI GOP's Urban Hostility Caucus rails at Milwaukee

If you accept the 'logic' of out-state legislators who don't want state transportation funding to help support Milwaukee's budding streetcar system, then do we want Milwaukee legislators to lead a de-funding of, say, the faraway and expensive now-delayed Stillwater bridge over the Mississippi River?

Or that I want a rebate of my share of state funds spent on the rebuilt Leo Frigo bridge in Green Bay because I haven't been on it in 14 years?  Or from the Madison bus system, because it's been decades since I used it?

Of course not. We're one state, with multiple modes and systems of transportation.

It's just that the Urban Hostility Caucus just doesn't get that. Or know when to stop.

Another attack on WI waters & their public trust ownership

[Updated from 8:14 p.m. Monday] Water-carriers at the State Capitol for developers are at it again: There is yet another outrageous plan by corporatist Wisconsin Republican legislators to enable construction near bodies of water and open them to private control:

The draft measures by Sen. Frank Lasee (R-DePere) and Rep. Alan Jarchow (R-Balsam Lake) would make it easier to develop dry lake beds; lessen the regulation of certain ditches and other manmade waterways; and make it easier for businesses or homeowners to get notifications from local governments about official actions that could affect their properties.  

The bills touch on a range of complex and often controversial issues like the rights of property owners, care for the environment and the powers of local elected officials. They have the support of influential groups such as the business lobbies for Realtors and builders in the state, but passing the measures with just a few months left in the legislative session could prove a challenge.

And we are not surprised, are we, especially at the ideological justification offered by co-drafter Frank Lasee? - - but, look: It's got to be clear by now that this latest ploy in the name of property rights vs. public rights is a part of a rolling, relentless scheme to reward special interests, grab public resources - - and this is the important political reality - - to overturn piecemeal the historic Wisconsin constitutional water-management guarantees known as the Public Trust Doctrine - - but comes conveniently in low-profile legislation without the schemers openly shouldering all the messy accountability associated with full-scale legislative votes, debates and a statewide referendum. As I wrote yesterday:  Anyone watching the coordinated weakening of Wisconsin's environmental laws under Scott Walker and his corporatist allies will not be surprised by the findings. But props to the Wisconsin State Journal for highlighting both the increased pace of wetland fillings in Wisconsin and the slow pace of creating compensatory artificial wetlands: Builders have been eliminating wetland acreage at the fastest pace in at least a decade under a controversial state law that eased protections for the ecologically important lands...But three and a half years later, a crucial element in the law’s provisions — replacement wetlands that were supposed to offset those eliminated by development — has been temporarily exhausted...it could be years before larger tracts of replacement wetlands are functioning.  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- More details of this latest sop to developers at the expense of wetlands, surface waters, and public input into key changes to the physical and political landscape are here. And the proposal is so sweeping, so should not be fast-tracked:

Also, the draft bill on waterways would codify a 2013 state Supreme Court decision that limited the Department of Natural Resource's authority to set water levels on Lake Koshkonong.  

The case stems from a long-standing dispute over water levels on the lake in Jefferson, Dane and Rock counties.  

A dam on the lake was repaired in 2002 and the water level was set at a low level sought by the DNR. Leaders of the local lake district sought a higher water level. Lower courts upheld the decision of the DNR until it reached the Supreme Court.  

In a 4-3 decision, the high court ruled that state's public trust doctrine doesn't apply to nonnavigable waters above the ordinary high water mark of a water body. The doctrine holds that Wisconsin lakes, river and streams are to be protected for the benefit of the general public. . 

So keep this in context, look at the record these last five years, and look at how the DNR still defines the Public Trust Doctrine - - after all the intentional rollbacks - - to absorb how much of our stat's natural environment and the people's heritage is threatened, and already lost:

The public trust doctrine

Wisconsin's Waters Belong to Everyone

Wisconsin lakes and rivers are public resources, owned in common by all Wisconsin citizens under the state's Public Trust Doctrine. Based on the state constitution, this doctrine has been further defined by case law and statute. It declares that all navigable waters are "common highways and forever free", and held in trust by the Department of Natural Resources.

And the look at the bigger picture here:

Whether it's voting suppression in the formerly open and progressive Wisconsin, or the shutdown of Planned Parenthood clinics and women's health services, or starved Medicaid financing, or slashed public and higher education or the enforced suffocation of minorities or impoverishment of workers in a low-wage, slow-growth state - - and ponder, honestly: what's the end game here, Bucky?

What's to be left of Wisconsin when this particular crowd leaves, or loses interest, or finally gets run outta town?

More WI wetlands being filled as replacement lags

[Updated] Anyone watching the coordinated weakening of Wisconsin's environmental laws under Scott Walker and his corporatist allies will not be surprised by the findings, but props to the Wisconsin State Journal for highlighting both the increased pace of wetland fillings in Wisconsin and the slow pace of creating compensatory artificial wetlands.

Builders have been eliminating wetland acreage at the fastest pace in at least a decade under a controversial state law that eased protections for the ecologically important lands...

But three and a half years later, a crucial element in the law’s provisions — replacement wetlands that were supposed to offset those eliminated by development — has been temporarily exhausted...it could be years before larger tracts of replacement wetlands are functioning.

Set aside for a moment that there is little chance a quick excavation-and-reseeding project - - no matter how well-intentioned - - can adequately replace a natural wetland that took centuries to form long before human settlement in Wisconsin - - and absorb the impact of the legislative and special interest agendas that have been intentionally substituted these past few years for a coherent, land-and-water environmental policy that serves the public interest first:

*  One of Walker's first administrative actions - - backed up almost immediately by the adoption of a fast-tracked law - - suspended an incomplete DNR review of a proposal by a Walker donor to fill a wetland for a development next to Lambeau Field.

That set the tone: development over conservation, special interests over the public interest, despite the reality that all the water in the state is connected, and that it belongs to everyone, and is supposed to be protected for its common purposes, as the State Constitution says.

* Builders bragged about their behind-the-scenes work with key Walker officials to get the wetlands-filling bill introduced.

* Walker signed the wetlands-filling bill in front of cheering Realtors.

* As I wrote about a year ago to the day about the DNR's wetlands restoration program:

Let's just be assured that this added method of wetlands restoration isn't to enable faster permitting for wetlands-killers, like the proposed iron ore mine in the Bad River watershed near Lake Superior or the planned upscale golf course along alongside and into Kohler Andrae state park south of Sheboygan.

Given new laws and priorities adopted by the Walker administration and implemented by a DNR run with a "chamber-of-commerce" mentality" that disregard science, minimize environmental inspections and enforcement, ease wetland protections, limit citizen involvement along the way and make business development a DNR goal, the agency can't be trusted to launch a plan for wetland restoration without people wanting to know why a wetland - - any wetland - - needs restoration or remediation in the first place.

On climate, people & business are ahead of ideologues

A big majority of Americans want the US to join other nations in a pact to address climate change, data show, and powerful business interests are taking high-profile actions to help clean the air (see statement below)  - - but conservative politicians openly beholden to the fossil fuel sector are promoting their tired, polluting line.

Here's one announcement tied to the ongoing Paris climate summit that contains good news:

For Immediate Release: November 30, 2015

Blair FitzGibbon, 1-202-503-6141, blair@soundspeedmedia.com

Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo Cut Coal Financing, Join Growing Movement by Banks in U.S. and Europe

Rainforest Action Network Calls on Banks to End All Financing for Coal

SAN FRANCISCO — Today, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo released new commitments to cut financing for the global coal industry. Wells Fargo’s policy committed to reduce the bank’s lending to coal mining companies. Morgan Stanley’s policy went further, covering both lending and underwriting, and committing to end financing for coal-fired power plant construction in developed countries.

These policy changes follow similar coal financing cuts at eight other banks earlier this year (Bank of America, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Crédit Agricole, ING, Natixis, and Société Générale). Morgan Stanley’s commitment followed public pressure from climate activists as part of a campaign launched by Rainforest Action Network (RAN) in October, the latest in a series of RAN campaigns to hold U.S. banks accountable for their financing of the coal industry.

"Today Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo announced they are cutting support for the coal mining sector, adding momentum to recent commitments made by Bank of America, Citigroup, and several others," said Lindsey Allen, Executive Director of RAN. "While the policies announced today do not go nearly far enough to realign the banking sector with the reality of climate change, they are a clear indication that major banks agree coal is an increasingly foolish and unacceptable investment."

Notably, Morgan Stanley’s coal policy statement acknowledges that the bank has a responsibility to contribute to the transition to a low-carbon economy and commits to report on the bank’s policy commitments to cut financing for coal mining and coal-fired power.

These policy announcements come on the same day that President Obama met with President Anote Tong of Kiribati and other leaders of small island states, who have called for a global moratorium on new coal mines. They also follow calls from the Paris Pledge, a global coalition of over 160 global civil society organizations which has urged the banking sector to phase out financing for coal mining and coal-fired power in the leadup to the U.N. climate conference underway in Paris, COP21.

###

Blair FitzGibbon President
Sound Speed Media 202-503-6141 Cell

www.soundspeedpr.com

In WI, 15,000 lose food stamps; GOP calls it a win

GOP 'reforms' working as planned by the Wisconsin Legislature's Urban Hostility Caucus and Gov. Walker, says the author of the bill to strip food stamps from some recipients:

Rep. Mark Born (R-Beaver Dam), chairman of the Assembly's committee on public benefit reform, said the changes are working as intended.

The food stamp 'reform' - - along with other new state-imposed restrictions on the amount of food stamp aid Wisconsin will distribute and also on the overall length of program recipient eligibility - - mandates that able-bodied adults without children work a certain number of hours in order to receive the food aid, but as the Journal Sentinel points out, job placements for those potential workers are scarce, the Journal Sentinel reports:

Since the new law took effect, just 7% of recipients in Milwaukee County — where about half of the able-bodied childless adult recipients live — who were referred to the FoodShare Employment and Training program were placed in jobs, the data show.

Meanwhile, another GOP legislator is scheming up a way to impound and even sell poor people's cars, even as transit connections and financing are cut.

And wages in many positions are frozen at the rock-bottom minimum of $7.25/hr., with job growth in the state lagging the national picture, thus Wisconsin is #1 a category no one wants lead: loss of middle-class incomes.

On, Wisconsin, land of compassionate easy scapegoats and hard-hearted conservatives and 

WI Republicans find new way to screw the poor

[Updated] Not content with freezing the minimum wage at the rock-bottom level of $7.25-per hour, and  mandating drug tests for food stamp recipients after already cutting that funding - - or limiting the number of years to four total in which public aid in Wisconsin can be received in a lifetime, or raising three taxes in the 2011-'13 state budget on low-income Wisconsinites while also turning back federal medicaid funding, or slashing public school financing, or cutting public bus system funding and ending routes from Milwaukee to suburban job centers - - the GOP's legislative Urban Hostility Caucus has a nasty new brainstorm: seizing vehicles from people caught driving without valid drivers' licenses.

And mandating that those seized vehicles be sold after 30 days if not claimed - - which means the ticketed driver would have somehow quickly pay a costly citation for the ticket, plus the towing and storage fees.

So - - pulled over for a broken tail light, or failing to yield, etc. - - can end up with a punitive and unconstitutional vehicle seizure that will further disconnect lower-income Wisconsin citizen from jobs, child care, medical appointments and other life necessities.

Read: Deeper, embedded poverty through government action.\

[Sunday Update - - Republicans are touting the recent removal of 15,000 Wisconsinites from the food stamp program as reform-in-action.]

Somehow the vehicle seizure proposal arose from a plan to finally and substantively reform Wisconsin's lax drunk-driving laws.

Fat chance, that, given the history of failed proposals and the power of various alcohol-centered special interests - - but let's hope there are not enough votes to take yet another shot at people already struggling by seizing and selling their cars.

I'm not saying it's OK to drive without a proper driver's license, but hammering poor people further down the socio-economic ladder instead of supporting creative and positive approaches to the intertwined problems of marginal incomes, municipal citations and disappearing public services is the mark of bigoted, authoritarian and hard-hearted governance.

After Keystone, WI is pipeline ground zero

The Canadian oil pipeline company with a record of spills and violations - - and which is already on its way to 'winning' permission in post-Walker de-regulated Wisconsin to vastly increase the carrying capacity of a major cross-state tar sand oil pipeline - - has even bigger pipeline plans for Bucky:

An entirely new pipeline running the length of the state to rival the risks to land and water of what the rejected Keystone XL pipeline would have carried, reports The Milwaukee Journal.

Opponents have been sounding this alarm for months:

Initial work is under way to “twin” Line 61, creating a new Line 66 in the same corridor that would carry an additional 800,000 bpd [barrels per day]. With Line 61 and new Line 66 at full capacity, 2 million barrels of tar sands oil would flow through Wisconsin each day.

File under accident, waiting to happen, along with this companion piece.

Some additional history and perspective:

Pipeline 61 with its expanded capacity - - actually, a tripling - - is ticketed to carry much more of the thick Canadian crude daily than was planned for Keystone XL, yet is being given an intentionally-cursory environmental 'review' by the conservative, pro-corporate ideologues running the "chamber of commerce mentality" Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for Gov. Walker.

And also was quietly given a sweetheart state budget amendment by compliant legislators this summer that blocked Dane County with its water-rich farm fields from requiring clean-up insurance if the Enbridge project spilled oil.

So much these days for local control in the Badger state.

Also: Remember the 2010 pipeline break into Michigan's Kalamazoo River, the biggest US inland oil spill event ever?

US EPA photo. Submerged oil recovery on the Kalamazoo River. (6/23/2011)

That was an Enbridge pipeline, and the company has had many pipeline breaks and environmental violations elsewhere.

In fact, almost two years to the day of Enbridge's Kalamazoo River spill, there was this story and headline:

Enbridge races to clean up Wisconsin oil spill, restart line

A summary post about many of these issues, here:

This blog has tried to help with some posts here, or here, for example; additional information has been posted about Enbridge's calamitous spill record in Michigan, Wisconsin and elsewhere, and the Journal Sentinel's reflexive editorial board approval of Wisconsin tar sand oil pipeline capacity without a more conscientious review by the DNR.

So props to Madison 350 for raising the alarm and fighting the fight locally, and also to national Keystone organizer and activist-author Bill McKibben for his tireless work.

Wisconsin again leads news of failed water stewardship

[Updated, 11/28/15, 12:45 p.m.]

As I've been writing and noting, Wisconsin's intentionally dismissive approach to water quality and management is drawing media attention, via the website Circle of Blue:

After years of watching their state do little to address stormwater runoff, polluted wells, and noxious algae blooms in once clear waters, 16 Wisconsin citizens last month decided enough was enough. They filed a petition with the federal Environmental Protection Agency to force Wisconsin to correct failures in its clean water program or else take away Wisconsin’s authority to administer permits under the Clean Water Act. 

It is a step of last resort expressing an utter lack of confidence in the state government’s ability and desire to protect its waterways. 

The past two decades have seen the dismantling of the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, the state agency in charge of issuing and enforcing clean water regulations, according to Kim Wright, executive director of Midwest Environmental Advocates. The agency’s workforce has declined 18 percent since 1995. Last summer Republican Governor Scott Walker abolished the agency’s water division and its Bureau of Science Services while eliminating 18 staff positions.

Update - - I'd also cited a Circle of Blue report last year on Waukesha's Great Lakes water diversion application:

And just a few days ago, Circle of Blue, an independent science and journalism collaborative and website in Michigan, focused on water issues - - and using information in documents obtained from the Waukesha Water Utility through the Wisconsin Open Records law - - raised fresh questions about how Waukesha applied key water levels' data in its possession about available underground water supplies to justify an application diverting water from Lake Michigan. 

Wisconsin open for business, on the quick and dirty

Quick, dirty, minimal and cheap.

It's new Wisconsin Idea, as Republican policy-makers have come up with yet another way of screwing working people and the environment at the same time while evading basic governing and public policy stewardship.

And this fake, small government trifecta, this latest iteration of cynical cold-hearted policy-making in our name has such a cynical twist:

The very conservatives who claim the mantle of fiscal responsibility and allegedly detest federal funding and have rejected if it were to fund more health care coverage for low-income citizens, or broadband upgrades in the information age, of for Amtrak construction are eager to get as much federal highway money but use it as a cudgel against the abutting environment and the very highway workers out there in the heat or the cold who driving the machines or laying the concrete.

That is some nasty bill-drafting and rule-tinkering, let me tell you.

Not content with passing the public-sector wage-limiting Act 10 or its companion, 'right-to-work' law aimed at private sector workers - - and scrapping the long-standing family-supporting "prevailing wage" guarantees for workers on local government road and public building projects - - and easing clean water, wetlands, shoreline preservation and related environmental protections in the state that gave birth to Earth Day - - GOP legislators now want to tinker with and shortcut some formulas and policies to minimize or end environmental protections and wage guarantees now required in big, federally-funded road projects, the Journal Sentinel reports:

The bill by Sen. Duey Stroebel and Rep. Robert Brooks, both Saukville Republicans, would require the state to rejigger how it allocates the federal road funding it receives so that some projects would not have to adhere to federal requirements. Total funding for roads would remain unchanged, but for some projects federal money would be supplanted by state or local money. 

Others would have more federal money — and less local and state money — assigned to them. 

By channeling federal aid into fewer projects, some road work would not have to follow federal policies that are more stringent and costly than state rules. That includes a federal law that sets a minimum pay for those building roads.

This is more than legislators shifting the burden for poor budgeting and special interest obeisance to  workers and the environment we all share pay while repeatedly approving dubious and unaffordable billion-dollar commitments to finance I-39/90 expansion from Beloit to the Dells, or eight-years of planned work in the mammoth Zoo Interchange and also to widen I-94 from Kenosha to Milwaukee without the money or a sustainable financing plan in hand.

This monkeying with road-building-and-financing rules and procedures is another example of this administration's intentional, ideologically-driven preference for quick-and-dirty over common resource protections that ensure public health and safety.

* One of Walker's first administrative actions after being sworn in as Governor was the suspension of an on-going permit review for a development planned by a campaign donor to build a building on a wetland next to Lambeau Field. The Legislature aligned with the Governor also quickly passed a bill to green light the development.

*  This is the same do-the-minimum mindset that has led the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources where Walker installed top managers with a "chamber of commerce mentality" to limit detailed environmental reviews on the proposed expansion of the tar sand oil Pipeline 61 capacity expansion from Superior to the Illinois border to a single pumping station expansion permit application rather than on the pipeline cross-state route.

* The is the same mentality that created the sweetheart iron mining bill approved by the GOP-led legislature with the encouragement of Gov. Walker that would have enabled the creation, through a fast-tracked environmental review tilted towards the company, of the hemisphere's largest open-pit iron mine deeply excavated for miles through the sensitive Penokee Hills/Bad River watershed near Lake Superior.

A drop in demand for iron ore worldwide, plus federal and tribal obstacles beyond the reach of the newly-weakened Wisconsin iron-mining statute, convinced the company to drop the project, but the one-sided law is still on the books.

Wisconsin legislators have found yet another way to twist law and policy - - this time to manipulate road-building finances instead of fixing the way they approve and fund big projects - - and are less interested if nearby rivers or wetlands or private properties are damaged by dirty air or polluted runoff, or if the roadwork work is done by employees with reduced training or skills, or with hammered take-home pay.

Warming climate melting America's glaciers

So much news lately about the warming climate - - no doubt prompted by the upcoming world climate summit beginning in a few days in Paris - - but this story is infuriating and heartbreaking, as these magnificent glacial are essential stores of water, too:

This crescent-shaped glacier in Montana’s northern Rockies had been contracting for decades because of warming temperatures. Lately it has been shrinking at a breathtaking clip, losing as much as a 10th of its mass in a single year. As early as 2030, scientists say, it may no longer exist. 

The glacier’s steep decline mirrors that of hundreds of other U.S. glaciers, from California’s Sierra Nevada to the North Cascades to the Central Alaska Range. All are in retreat, yet nowhere are the effects so profoundly felt as here in Glacier National Park, which experts say could be glacier-free by mid-century. 

“They’ll be gone in a few decades,” said Dan Fagre, a scientist with the U.S. Geological Survey who monitors the park’s 25 remaining glaciers and plots each year’s losses. “Every year exposes rock that hasn’t seen daylight in centuries.”

Desultory WisDOT complex to feature lots of parking, right angles

Back in the day, public buildings were designed to please the eye and last for a hundred years or more.

Not so at Hilldale on Madison's West side, where WisDOT and other state agencies' new buildings are being combined with a seven-story parking ramp.

Pesky facts debunk alleged climate warming 'pause'

The only thing that's cooling is the far-right's embrace of science, The Washington Post reports:

This National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) image shows the satellite sea surface temperature departure for the month of October 2015, where orange-red colors are above normal temperatures and are indicative of El Nino. (AFP Photo/Handout/NOAA)

Even as Lamar Smith (R-Tx.), chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, continues to investigate a high profile study from federal scientists debunking the idea of a global warming slowdown or “pause,” a new study reaches the same conclusion — in a different yet complementary way.

“There is no substantive evidence for a ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’ in warming,” write Stephan Lewandowsky, a professor at the University of Bristol in the UK, and two colleagues in Tuesday’s Nature Scientific Reports. “We suggest that the use of those terms is therefore inaccurate.”

No doubt mistaken for deer

Two sandhill cranes were illegally shot and killed in a Wisconsin nature preserve. The fine is $303.30 per bird; additional charges could be filed, authorities say.

Not the first illegal crane kill in recent years here.

Remember the whooper that was among one renegade hunter's takings?

An argument in favor of continuing wolf hunt ban

The Wolves of Douglas County Wisconsin blog is carrying a new post that argues against lifting the current federal ban on grey wolf hunting in several states that suspended the controversial Wisconsin wolf hunt following last year's 'harvest.'

Wolves must remain under federal protection until individual states, such as Wisconsin, can learn how to protect an iconic species. Scientists have just begun to understand how essential wolves are to maintaining healthy ecosystems. 

Hunting wolves as a management tool only serves special interest groups bent on eradication. 

Here is an additional post that supports the allegation that Wisconsin's wolf hunting (dogs allowed, only in Wisconsin) and permissible hound training laws and practices were among the most cruel:

You might also want to read up on various baiting and hunting training methods allowed by state law in Wisconsin.

Also: 

Wisconsin Licenses, Tolerates Wildlife Cruelty 

The only thing that stops a bad guy twisting the law...

Are good attorneys...

Cullen Weston Pines & Bach (CWPB) 

...this time winning at the federal appellate level and blocking the Walker machine's scheme to shut down Wisconsin Planned Parenthood clinics and deny to women their vital and legal medical services.

And I say "this time" because nearly three years ago to the day, the Capital Times said:

Attorney Lester Pines racks up impressive wins against GOP agenda

Important that the climate summit happens in Paris

It's reassuring that the world summit on climate change scheduled to begin at the end of the month in Paris will be held as scheduled - - minus one large citizen march - - despite the horrifying atrocities which struck the city and continue to stretch French security resources.

Here is an official website with links and portals to more information.

Postponing the conference would be a win for terrorism; a successful program will be good for the planet and prove that Paris can survive a crisis and manage continuing threats and host a world-class event.

Another report about Wisconsinites denied clean drinking water

The Center for Investigation Reporting continues a run of important stories about the state's troubled waters with yet another piece about Wisconsin residents who  - - in this the year 2015 - - do not have access to safe drinking water.  Here's the latest with a Sauk City dateline:

The source of the contamination: the now-closed Badger Army Ammunition Plant.
Badger was a military installation built in 1942 on more than 7,000 acres near Baraboo…

During its operation, the plant pumped excess chemicals and millions of gallons of wastewater into Lake Wisconsin and burned toxic substances in large pits on the site, leaving the soil, surface and groundwater contaminated with a dangerous stew of chemicals, including some known or likely to cause cancer... 

While the land is being redeveloped for recreation, dairy research and tribal uses, the groundwater under the Badger site remains polluted.

Another summary dealing with various Wisconsin water issues, here.

Remember Lake Erie's algae poisoning? Well, follow the manure

It was and is a crisis, and taxpayers are enabling it, says this report:

Follow the Manure: Factory Farms and the Lake Erie Algal Crisis

 - a report that takes an unprecedented look at the relationship between the manure load from factory farms in the Western Lake Erie Watershed (WLEW) and the federal subsidies that have poured into the region to facilities that generate that waste over the last seven years. 

Between 2008 and 2015, U.S. Department of Agriculture direct payments, cost‐ shares and other conservation subsidies to owners of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) totaled more than $16.8 million in the WLEW, which includes Ohio, southern Michigan and eastern Indiana.

This report shows that millions of dollars in taxpayer funds continued to be disbursed, even as phosphorus contamination levels in the WLEW climbed and CAFOs in the watershed were fined for illegal waste discharges.

Groundwater, a WI concern, also being drained in in the US plains

We've been both reporting and distributing information about the supply, quality and regulatory issues surrounding groundwater in Wisconsin, but note in this report from the US Great Plains that it's a widespread US problem:

Using current trends in water usage as a guide, the researchers estimate that 3 percent of the aquifer's water was used up by 1960; 30 percent of the aquifer's water was drained by 2010; and a whopping 69 percent of the reservoir will likely be tapped by 2060. It would take an average of 500 to 1,300 years to completely refill the High Plains Aquifer, Steward added.

Milwaukee County Board flushes away river improvement, funding

That sound of water running surrounding the Milwaukee County Board's decision preserving the broken obstruction known as the Estabrook Dam and deciding against letting the Milwaukee River flow naturally to Lake Michigan is more taxpayer money being flushed down the drain.

Think of it this way:

Suppose for years you've known you have an obstruction in your windpipe that is causing you all sorts of problems.

The doctor says the obstruction can be removed and your overall health will improve, but you opt for having the doctor implant alongside an artificial supplemental windpipe and reinforce the obstruction - - all at twice the cost but paid for by someone else.

Bad medicine does not good management make.