[Updated 4:01 p.m., with link quoting 30% goal by 2030. Further updated, 9:50 p.m.]
The US Environmental Protection Agency will release on Monday its long-awaited plan to bring about a reduction in the amount of polluting coal that utilities burn to generate electricity.
According to The White House Blog:
Today, as part of the President’s Climate Action Plan, the EPA proposed new carbon pollution standards for power plants. These standards represent a commonsense proposal that will have huge benefits for all Americans. In fact, for every dollar of investment spurred by this proposal, there is roughly seven dollars’ worth of health benefits in return.
Right-wing talk radio and its energy-sector special interest allies will tell you that this means the sky will fall, that we will be plunged into darkness and joblessness - - just as they told you in earlier End Times That Did Not Happen that the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, Medicare, vehicle emission standards and the US Surgeon General's Report on Smoking would shred the Constitution, kill jobs, or force us to pedal one-speed bikes to work wearing Mao jackets.
What
the EPA's plan will do is give
the states - - note that, please - - substantial flexibility to hit modest carbon-emission reduction targets and thus reduce the massive tonnage of noxious gases that are warming and changing the climate,
drying the Great Plains and igniting the US West,
melting the glaciers, raising sea levels, turning hurricanes into costly, killer super storms and poisoning your kids and grandparents' lungs.
Here's
an example, posted tonight, on The Washington Post website, about climate-change influenced high tides routinely flooding Virginia.
Now.
The Washington Post's
Greg Sargent has posted a solid analysis of the proposal's political impacts.
Im Wisconsin, I would expect Gov. Scott Walker to use the proposal as accelerant against the President as he did over Obamacare, federally-paid Medicaid expansion or the Amtrak train line to Madison and now-shuttered Milwaukee-based assembly plant which Walker killed to boost his national anti-Obama role, standing with corporate funders and Tea Party cred.
But Walker made his energy conservation responsibilities and Wisconsin's compliance more difficult because
he obstructed clean-air, job-creating wind farm construction, and reduced state government energy
conservation programming and other initiatives designed to reduce carbon emissions.
His hand-picked "chamber-of-commerce"leadership at the DNR has not updated
the agency's climate change page since June 18, 2012 - - a fact I have cited on this blog often, along with notices that the agency had
scrubbed content and links after Walker's election because t
hey noted the work of the Doyle administration, Walker's go-to-excuse.
Walker did not set the state on a greener path and worse,
already took the Koch brothers-inspired pro-fossil-fuels' pledge.
And they already have our
Sen. Ron Johnson in their pocket.