How Many Many Businesses Were Razed for I-43N Years Ago?
The number might surprise you.
A forum, news site and archive begun in February, 2007 about politics and the environment in Wisconsin. And elsewhere.
The number might surprise you.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
10:24 PM
0
comments
I'm pouring through some open records documents that have caught my interest in the wake of my earlier revelation that the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission has been springing for a $1,000 taxpayer-paid annual dinner at The University Club on Milwaukee's lower East side for commissioners, staff and consultants.
After the holidays, I'll post the details - - I've got follow-up requests sent by email - - but suffice it to say that SEWRPC's Executive Director Ken Yunker takes various officials and other opinion-makers to breakfast and lunch on a regular basis, with an agency credit card, even though he has a very nice office quite close to the Waukesha-area restaurants where he (tazpayers) picks up the tab.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
11:41 AM
0
comments
Well, the intrigue is over: Wisconsin becomes the fourth of eight Great Lakes states to urge US Supreme Court action to force Illinois to close canal connections through which destructive Asian carp could invade Lake Michigan and wreak havoc in the Great Lakes.
Though a brief filed by Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen. Wisconsin joins Michigan, the lead in this matter, and the states of Ohio and Minnesota.
But will it be enough?
And is legal action the only strategy to get Illinois to give up its parochial protectionism for an antiquated canal through which the carp could get into the Great Lakes?
I'm not sure if the Supreme Court will take any action because it might have to reopen Chicago's long-standing, Court-sanctioned diversion of Lake Michigan water - - though a multi-state action legal attack might, through public pressure and opinion, convince Illinois to take remedial action.
But maybe Illinois needs a stronger push to be a better Great Lakes steward and neighbor.
Remember when the State of Arizona refused to make Martin Luther King, Jr's birthday a holiday?
That led to a national tourist boycott - - which, along with bad publicity, helped the political and business establishment there finally approve the holiday designation.
In fact, it was just a few months ago that Chicago-area motorists were picketing British Petroleum gas stations over Indiana's approval for a permit allowing BP's Whiting, Indiana refinery to expand and add pollutants to Lake Michigan.
A few days of bad PR, and BP backed down and said it would capture those pollutants for on-site treatment instead.
So let's not rule out a good, old-fashioned consumer and tourist boycott aimed at Illinois should the Supreme Court dawdle, or worse, decline to force the canal and locks to close.
The canal is an artificial tributary that connects the Great Lakes to the Mississippi River basin and serves as Chicago's sewerage discharge route.
Yes, it has helped keep sewage out of Lake Michigan but now could be the Great Lakes undoing because it offers the invasive carp an easy and direct route from the Mississippi River to Lake Michigan - - endangering a multi-billion dollar commercial fishing and a regional recreational industry.
Right now, Illinois and Chicago seem wedded to the canal for economic reasons and decline to take alternatives seriously.
Maybe closing off the flow of tourist revenue to Illinois businesses and state tax collection coffers will help Illinois officials close off the canal and locks.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
10:02 PM
0
comments
The US Coast Guard has implemented restrictions on boaters to try and block Asian carp from moving through the Chicago sanitary and ship canal, and into Lake Michigan,
Here is the text, with contact information and additional materials:
U.S. Coast Guard establishes safety zone and regulated navigation area near Romeoville, IL.
http://greatlakesrestoration.us/?p=184
CLEVELAND – The U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan has issued a safety zone and regulated navigation area on the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, in Romeoville, IL.
The regulated navigation area is from mile marker 295 to 297.5, and the safety zone is between mile markers 296.1 and 296.7.
The regulation has been established to protect mariners and the environment.
In summary, the regulation states all vessels (towboats, barges,recreational craft) are prohibited from transiting the safety zone if they intend to carry water attained from one side of the barrier and discharge that same water, in any form, within or on the other side of the safety zone. This applies to vessels north- and south-bound.
If vessels intend to discharge water, they must request permission from the Captain of the Port Sector Lake Michigan prior to transiting and any subsequent discharge will be done in a biologically sound manner.
This regulation serves as a precautionary measure to prevent the possible movement of live Silver or Asian carp, their viable eggs, orgametes from these carp across the fish barrier through discharge of non-potable water.
There is no direct evidence that this is an actual bypass vector, but the ACRRW Executive committee agrees it is a prudent measure to eliminate the possibility.
As a precautionary effort, industry has been voluntarily complying with this practice since September.
CLICK HERE for a full copy of the regulation http://greatlakesrestoration.us/action/wp-content/uploads/12-18-2009-CSSC-Safety-Zone-and-RNA.pdf
Pranas Pranckevicius, CISSPU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes National Program Office 77 West Jackson Blvd. G-17J Chicago, IL 60604-3590
pranckevicius.pranas@epa.gov
312 353-3437
Tel 312 385-5446
Fax www.epa.gov/greatlakes
Posted by
James Rowen
at
5:40 AM
0
comments
Glenn Grothman has had enough of Madison and the weather, so look out!
The ultra-conservative Republican State Senator from West Bend, wants to strip Madison of its local governmental power to plow the streets and establish road salting practices.
He said in a recent hissy fit that Madison's policies endanger people.
But Grothman reminds me of the classic visiting motorist from down South who didn't leave enough time to get to work in a predicted December Wisconsin snowstorm - - and wants the Nanny state to ease his insecurities the next time winter breaks out here.
What's next for the cranky gentlemen from Washington County: A special state patrol detail, complete with plow, to escort Grothman to his reserved parking spot on the Capitol Square?
Posted by
James Rowen
at
12:03 AM
0
comments
Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett is urging Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen to get actively involved in efforts to help block Asian carp from taking over the Great Lakes.
Here is the text of Barrett's letter:
December 29, 2009
Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen
Wisconsin Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
Dear Attorney General Van Hollen:
I am asking that you join the State of Michigan’s request to the U.S. Supreme Court for an injunction to close the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and prevent the spread of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes.
I recently sent a letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency urging that these two agencies undertake a review of closing the locks at the Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal. I believe that we have reached the point where it is imperative to close waterways in Illinois to prevent the introduction of Asian Carp into the Great Lakes.
Asian Carp pose an economic and ecological threat to the entire Great Lakes, and their entry into Lake Michigan would cause irreparable harm to not only the Great Lakes, but also to Wisconsin’s rivers and lakes.
Other states, such as Minnesota and Ohio, have filed suit to the U.S. Supreme Court seeking legal means to stop the spread of Asian Carp. It is imperative that Wisconsin also takes an active role in this suit, and I urge you to file a brief with the Supreme Court prior to its consideration of this matter on January 8, 2010.
Sincerely,
Tom Barrett
Mayor
Posted by
James Rowen
at
5:29 PM
0
comments
Congratulations to Joel Brammeier, succeeding Cam Davis at the helm of the Alliance for the Great Lakes,
Posted by
James Rowen
at
4:55 PM
1 comments
Ao argues former Milwaukee Mayor John Norquist, in a Hartford Courant op-ed.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
4:15 PM
0
comments
The Wisconsin Department of Transportation - - having handed out an $11 million contract for a interchange repair job to a sole bidder - - now spins out reasons we should be happy that last-minute negotiations have run up the cost of the job another $4 million.
Can you imagine the backlash from legislators and talk show hosts if a social services contractor or agency was behaving this way with millios of public dollars?
Posted by
James Rowen
at
1:24 PM
1 comments
The New York Times explains why.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
5:32 AM
4
comments
Minnesota joins Michigan, and Ohio asking for US Supreme Court intervention to force a fix in the Illinois shipping canal and lock system through which the northward-migrating, predatory carp are moving.
Wisconsin? Once the leader in Great Lakes preservation?
Still ruminating...
Will we be fourth among the Great Lakes states?
Fifth? Six? Last (Illinois not included)?
Posted by
James Rowen
at
9:56 PM
0
comments
And you would let Scott Walker oversee Wisconsin's treasures?
Think again. Milwaukee County First has the evidence.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
8:03 AM
0
comments
Waukesha continues to spend heavily on water planning consultants - - now bringing yet another firm on board for annual funding in the $125,000-range.
These dollars, while coming from water bill payments and not property taxes, are still public funds and hardly small city chump change:
Waukesha budget records show less was budgeted in 2009 to buy all projected supplies for Fire Department Emergency Medical (EMS) and Fire Prevention and Education Services ($111,293), or to run the entire 15-member Waukesha Common Council ($105,114) - - and that's just a fraction of the totals Waukesha has paid in recent years to diversion-related scientists, lobbyists, consultants, PR firms and lawyers.
Read on:
A document among many provided by the Waukesha Water Utility to this blog in mid-December indicates that the Milwaukee consulting firm CH2M Hill , at the 11th hour, will take over Waukesha's Lake Michigan diversion planning work that was handled primarily since 2004 by two Chicago firms, The Cadmus Group, and later, GeoSyntec.
This task was described in a November 16, 2009 Utility Scope of Services memo to Utility commissioners - - details and some of the contracting history is below.
Waukesha's long-anticipated water diversion application, the first from a community outside of the Great Lakes Basin, but within a county that straddles it as defined in the historic Great Lakes Compact approved last year, was to be released for comment in early December - - after five years of study - - but was abruptly delayed.
Promises, promises - - made by officials at a special Waukesha Common Council meeting with the Waukesha Water Utility in October.
December release, scheduled.
Why the delay, even though Waukesha has been telling Milwaukee aldermen that time is of the essence and paperwork has to be approved immediately to allow Waukesha to explore buying its Lake Michigan water from the Milwaukee Water Works?
The Utility memo explained that its long-time scientific consultant GeoSyntec had eliminated the position occupied by the main person assigned to the Waukesha diversion application project, so with $112,500 available to CH2M HILL from accounts that could have paid GeoSyntec into 2010, CH2M Hill will do this with GeoSyntec's unreleased, still-confidential draft:
"...refine, rewrite and reformat the document. The goals in the new work are to:
* Present a clear understanding of the Compact diversion requirements for a straddling county.
* Review and explain the science, engineering, and planning that are the basis for the Application.
* Provide fact-based benefits of the Utility's Lake Michigan water supply alternative in layman's terms.
* Prepare graphics and messages to explain technical issues for use in Application and public involvement communications.
* Review previously prepared and presented cost estimates. Confirm cost figures are in 2009 dollars. Cite all sources of both financial and technical information at the end of each section of Application.
* Organize applicable technical backup information for ease of future reference. "
That's seems like one heckuva rewrite, though Water Utility General Manager Dan Duchniak told me by email that he is confident in the outcome:
"We have been working on our timeline and I anticipate we will have something to be released in January," he said.
Waukesha has already spent heavily without an application to show for it.
Utility contract records [I will work to flesh cite a complete set] show payments to Cadmus, then GeoSyntec, authorized by the Utility that included $126,000 to Cadmus in two phases in 2004 and into 2005, $75,000 in 2005 into 2006, and $183,400 in two phases in 2008 and into 2009.
On October 10, 2008, a Utility memo to its commissioners from Duchniak said the then-current contract with GeoSyntec signed in January of that year was "for work to finalize an application for Great Lakes Water, provide assistance to move the application through the approval process, [emphasis mine] and to continue assisting the Utility in developing and implementing a citywide water conservation and protection plan."
Now the task to finalize and explain the application falls to CH2M Hill.
In addition to contracts with Cadmus, GeoSyntec and now Ch2M Hill, the Waukesha Water Utility (through its ratepayers) has paid out additional hundreds of thousands of dollars in the same time frame to five public relations, lobbying, and law firms in Wisconsin and Washington, DC, for advice on the diversion application process and related water supply issues, records show.
Before it's all over, Waukesha will probably hit a million dollars paid to such firms. That's a lot of of dough for a small city.
Time will tell if it was well spent.
Also: I can't resist mentioning that some of this last-minute application rewriting by Waukesha might have been avoided had the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources written or at least gotten started writing more than a year ago administrative rules to more fully implement the Great Lakes Compact in Wisconsin.
The DNR could have unambiguously laid out, with public input, exactly what constituted a complete, comprehensive and workable application.
Last-minute scrambling by Waukesha, in the absence of Wisconsin administrative rules, will not raise the confidence level in the application of the other seven Great Lakes states - - and all eight of the states must approve the Waukesha application.
All in all, hardly the way you would want to see the precedent-setting application be rolled out.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
8:58 PM
0
comments
Interesting study: the more money a company's CEO grabs, the worse is the company's financial future.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
11:22 AM
0
comments
Well-argued op-ed against eased rules for nuclear plant construction in Wisconsin.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
10:06 AM
0
comments
The Washington Post notes Michigan's leadership in fighting the Asian carp invasion - - while Wisconsin sits on the sidelines, navel-gazing.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
5:28 AM
0
comments
For starters, let's get rid of the 60-vote threshold.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
12:45 AM
1 comments
A couple of weeks ago, two federal agencies renewed some authority that they give to the regional planning commission (SEWRPC), but told the planners they needed to better communicate with the public, using plain English and not plannerspeak (my word, not theirs).
And, of course, SEWRPC dutifully said it was making great strides in that assignment.
So on the SEWRPC homepage, www.sewrpc.org, here is the very first single paragraph of text that. ironically, comically, describes that federal reauthorization.
Plain English??
"Certification of the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process
During the fall of 2008, The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) conducted a federally required quadrennial review of the metropolitan transportation planning process carried out by the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC). The objective of this review was to determine whether the metropolitan transportation process meets the Federal transportation planning requirements outlined in 23 CFR 450.300 and to assure that an adequate process exists to ensure conformity of plans and programs in accordance with the procedures contained in 50 CFR Part 51. The 2008 certification review was based on routine FHWA and FTA interaction with the Commission in day-to-day operations; a review of SEWRPC planning products and processes; a field review meeting with staff from SEWRPC, the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, and local transit operators October 22-23, 2008; a public comment period from October 8 to November 8, 2008; and, a public open house meeting on the evening of October 23, 2008. Based on the reviews conducted and ongoing oversight by FHWA and FTA, the Commission’s metropolitan transportation planning process has been certified as meeting the Federal transportation planning requirements. The report documenting the evaluation of SEWRPC planning processes can be found here."
Posted by
James Rowen
at
8:17 PM
2
comments
The editorial is right on the money.
If the Great Lakes are leaking water, plug the hole.
Posted by
James Rowen
at
8:14 PM
0
comments