Friday, July 18, 2008

The Proliferation Of "Thug" Describing Some Black Men

Some conservative bloggers are sticking up for one of their own whom I called out here for his attaching the term "Thug" to Milwaukee County Board Chairman Lee Holloway.

The bloggers' comments in that post defending their blogging cohort "No Runny Eggs" scramble spin and denial.

What made Holloway thug-worthy? Supporting a sales tax increase.

I guess in the mind of a conservative blogger, a tax increase is a crime, which would mean that some politicians are probably headed for the gallows!

Look out all you Republican legislators who supported the annual gas tax "indexed" increase (which I always thought was cowardly, bad public policy) - - these bloggers might be coming for you next.

Here is an interesting discussion about this phenomenon of racializing "thug" from the Atlanta Constitution.

Let's see how long it takes some people to spin it towards some tangential gripe.

Does This Mean WisDOT Will Engineer Light Rail?

Wisconsin's top transportation official tells the Kansas City Star that passenger rail is the way to go.

I agree, and though Frank Busalacchi was talking about Amtrak, the same arguments hold up for light rail, too.

Thanks to Michael Horne for passing this along.

Milwaukee County Board Chair Supports A Sales Tax Increase: Does That Make Him A "Thug?"

At least one self-described "hard-boiled" righty blogger can't stop playing the race card.

That's the only conclusion you can come to when "Thug" - - a word that worked itself into the local vocabulary following particularly violent crimes, and especially during former Ald. Michael McGee's legal troubles - - suddenly becomes Holloway's middle name, too.

Apparently on at least one right-wing blog from the south Milwaukee suburbs - - and so far I'm not seeing anyone on the conservative side of the blogosphere take the race-baiter to task - - Holloway's 'crime' was supporting a sales tax increase, in a public policy debate, at the Milwaukee County Board.

Which he chairs, as the Supervisors' elected leader.

In other words, where he does his job.

Yes, readers outside greater Milwaukee and beyond, this is part of the heavily-racialized public debate that is endured here.

The blogger, "No Runny Eggs" [yes, that is the blog's name], wrote this:

"Charlie Sykes has the text of a press release from Milwaukee County Board Chair Lee “Thug” Holloway purporting to claim that, even with a 1-percentage-point increase in the sales tax in Milwaukee County, it would still be “cheaper” to shop in Milwaukee County than in surrounding counties."

Despite the way that the "No Runny Eggs" wrote the item, Sykes did not use the "Thug" word when he criticized Holloway's tax increase plan on the"Sykes Writes" blog.

So is every politician who ever supported a tax increase now a "Thug" to the Right?

Former Pres. George H. W. Bush raised several taxes during his Presidency. It helped cost him re-election, but does it make him a "Thug?"

Where does that leave Scott Jensen and Tommy Thompson, Republicans who supported the long-standing, and thankfully-ended automatic annual cent-a-gallon state gasoline tax increase?

Or how about Holloway's white sales tax increase allies on the Milwaukee County Board of Supervisors, like John Weishan, Jr., or my Supervisor, Gerry Broderick?

What about Milwaukee Alderman Bob Bauman, lead sponsor, with plenty of white aldermanic supporters, of a plan to fix City of Milwaukee streets with the proceeds of a new wheel tax?

Are all those current and former elected officials "Thugs"...or is that term just reserved by certain righty bloggers - - with the silent assent of others - - to describe African-American politicians they don't agree with?

[Update: Google informs me that "No Runny Eggs" has attacked "Lee "Thug" Holloway before. What an embarrassment for our County.]








Milwaukee County's $20+ Million Question To SEWRPC: What Have We Gotten For Those Tax Dollars?

Through a little-noticed annual transfer in its budget, Milwaukee County has sent a tidy sum to the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission since SEWRPC's 1960 establishment to help fund agency operations.

As the county's financing gets more strained, and public services from parks to transit keep taking cuts, isn't it time that Milwaukee County taxpayers - - and also Milwaukee city residents who pay about 48% of the county annual levy - - get a solid accounting for the money that is sent to SEWRPC each year?

It's not chickenfeed:

In just this decade, the Milwaukee County budget has delivered $7,250,000 to SEWRPC.

The payments in this decade have consistently covered about 36% of SEWRPC's operating budget, SEWRPC records show.

In past years, Milwaukee County's share of the SEWRPC operating budget was higher - - falling from 65% in the early 1960's to 50% in 1980 to 40% in 1995 - - because Milwaukee County's share of the seven-county region's equalized property value has fallen relative to the other counties shares.

SEWRPC receives additional funds in grants from and contracts with other local, state and federal agencies; 100% of the SEWRPC budget comes from public sources.

But Milwaukee County's dollar contribution to SEWRPC is still the largest county contribution among SEWRPC's seven member counties - - Milwaukee, Waukesha, Walworth, Washington, Racine, Kenosha and Ozaukee.

Despite carrying the lion's share of the counties' annual funding to SEWRPC, Milwaukee County continues to get the same three votes on the SEWRPC board that the lesser-valued, and lesser-populated counties have.

But SEWRPC's county-members-only board is not based on population.

That means the City of Milwaukee gets no seats on the commission, even though the City of Milwaukee's annual share of the SEWRPC operating budget through Milwaukee County - - about $400,000 this year - - exceeds the payments made to SEWRPC by each of these counties: Washington, Ozaukee, Walworth, Racine or Kenosha, records show.

That is what is called taxation without representation, and is one reason among many that the City and/or the County of Milwaukee should withdraw from SEWRPC and use Milwaukee tax and planning dollars on programs and people that place Milwaukee city and county interests first.
In the 48 years of SEWRPC's existence, with the funding formula, but not board power tilted towards Milwaukee County, the Milwaukee County total tax dollar transfer to SEWRPC has been $20,470,000, SEWRPC records show.

Isn't it time for Milwaukee County to state what value it feels it has received for all those Milwaukee city and county property tax dollars?

Certainly it would hold a contractor to those standards, and also for reporting compliance with applicable statutes regarding minority employment.

Isn't it time for Milwaukee County to hold SEWRPC accountable for the use of those dollars, and to make sure more SEWRPC spending and jobs go to Milwaukee city and county residents?

Though Milwaukee County has the largest number of minority residents among the seven SEWRPC counties, there are only five full-time minority employees on SEWRPC's full-time staff of 66 - - one professional employee, three technical employees and one clerical employee, according to SEWRPC affirmative action records.

An Eight-Year Mistake Coming To An End, But First...

Bush dumps on the G-8.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

More Evidence That Shutting The St. Lawrence Seaway Is Necessary

Invasive species slipping through the St. Lawrence Seaway are killing the Great Lakes and industries that depend on those waters being fresh and clean, studies show.

Closing the Seaway to ocean-going ships that bring in the crippling invasives until effective controls can be instituted - - a position supported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - - should happen immediately.

Greg Kowalski Discloses WisDOT Deficiences In A Round About Way

A priceless description of a state transportation department-sponsored informational session, from Franklin blogger Greg Kowalski.

As the texters say, LOL.

Milwaukee Scores High On Cities' Walkability Ranking Nationally

Milwaukee is a great city for people on foot, according to a new national ranking.

Pedestrians are also residents, shoppers and tourists - - folks spending money and choosing to live, work and play where walkability meets their needs, and those of the businesses and institutions where pedestrians are headed.

Do you think that planners at the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, the State Department of Transportation, as well as local officials here - - I'm talking to you, Scott Walker - - will put two and two together and realize that serving the transportation needs of people who are not behind the wheel of a car is good for the economy?

Brian Fraley Needs To Read Before He Blogs

Republican pundit Brian Fraley rips liberals for not opposing Wisconsin's minimum markup law that artificially increases the price of gasoline.

I blogged about this twice since May, 2007. In this one, the words "stupid state law" appear in the title I wrote.

This post calls it "onerous" and "costly."

Don't let yourself be imprisoned by ideology and assumptions, Brian.

The Road To Sprawlville, Chapter XVIII: Beating The Commute By Sleeping In The Truck

In this blog's latest installment about sprawl 'development,' we use a lengthy catalogue in the Madison Capital Times to grasp the sickening realities facing commuting motorists.

The "Sprawlville" series usually focuses on the greater Milwaukee area, where few farms and wetlands have been safe from developer depravation and road-building excess, but don't worry, I'll bring this chapter to a close with some local southeastern Wisconsin information.

But the Capital Times finds local folks there dealing with $100 fill-ups, evaporation of home equities in too-far-from Madison housing, and this stunner:

One Spring Green woman's overnighting once a week in her truck at a state park that has good showers to avoid the long and costly return trip home that day.

That, my friends, is what is called "unsustainable," even if the campsite is serene.

What's next: selling the house and pitching a permanent tent in the state park?

Homes in walkable neighborhoods in cities or close-in, older suburbs, especially when served by modern transit, will hold their values and owners' investments better than properties in more rural sites, regardless of how beautiful the surroundings may be.

Imagine how well-situated are the residents along Milwaukee's downtown riverfront, or in Third Ward condos, with jobs, night life, shops and The Public Market within walking distance.

I happened to be in the Third Ward today, and the area was bustling. It still felt growing, and successful.

I also was out in Pabst Farms a few days ago. That's the huge upscale planned (sic) community in far western Waukesha, not far from the Jefferson County line, where some entire subdivision construction has been suspended.

Aurora's big hospital is going up on former farmland south of I-94, and there was some home-building underway in some of the residential portions north of the highway, but there were also plenty of "sale" signs, one "sold" sign (I didn't tour all the subdivisions on the 1,500-acre site) and very, very few people out and about at 11:45 a.m.

The parking lots at some of the shops were perhaps half-full, and ground has not been broken on the delayed mega-mall still ticketed for acreage in the complex, though anchor tenants have not been announced, one mall developer last year bailed out altogether and a related plan to dun state and local taxpayers $23+ million for a full diamond interchange off I-94 to service the mall from both east and west is also on hold.

And that uncertainty was well underway before gas approached, then blew through, the $4 barrier.

Expensive gas is our new, pain-at-the-pump-and-in-the-you-know-what-paradigm.

I saw it this week in Waukesha County priced at a jaw-dropping $4.399 cents-a-gallon at the Mobil station at I-94 and State Highway 164, with perverse appropriateness, just a few yards south of the headquarters of the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission.

That's the agency that provided the State Transportation Department with a plan in 2003 to rebuild and expand the so-called freeway system in the region's seven counties at a cost to the public of $6.5 billion.

The plan included traffic projections based on gasoline priced at $2.30-a-gallon in 2005, with 3% annual increases thereafter, putting it for the planners' purposes at $2.51 today.

Ouch.

Yet included in the plan are 127 miles of new freeway lanes, some of which will run right past Pabst Farms when the last stages of this round of freeway construction is completed in about 15-20 years.

And highway planners across the Midwest are lobbying as we speak for more gas taxes to build more roads.

Unless there is a change in the planners' math and our politicians' mindsets, the next schedule of freeway expansion will no doubt be moving from the drawing boards to the contracting bidding process.

If state and regional planners don't pull the current freeway expansion plan off the books right now - - $1.9 billion is about to be committed to an eight-year binge on I-94 between Milwaukee and the Illinois state line, adding 70 miles of new lanes - - and substitute comprehensive transit investments instead, we'll be literally throwing away billions into the highway-expansion maw.

As with the woman from Spring Green beating some of her commuting costs to Madison by sleeping between cities in her truck, it's an unsustainable model.

Building more and wider highways will help neither city dwellers looking for transit, and their exurban and small-town compatriots who are stranded in the boonies by fuel costs that will keep on rising.

San Diego Has - - Gasp! - - A One-County Regional Planning Commission

Some officials in the public and private sectors freaked out a few weeks ago when I suggested in a Journal Sentinel op-ed that Milwaukee withdraw from the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission (SEWRPC) and create its own one-city or county commission.

Impossible they said, even though Dane County has its own one-county commission, and has turned over to the City of Madison government the responsibility for transportation planning.

If that were the case around here, we'd already have an up-to-date housing study (SEWRPC issued the last one in 1975, when Gerald Ford was President) and modern transit, like light rail.

And a commission that gave minorities a decent shot at jobs, and not the 7% minority hiring rate that includes only one minority member on the 42-person professional staff that has managed to land a job there.

(Along with four other minorities in so-called technical and clerical full-time positions.)

Instead, Milwaukee has to wait for the suburban planners and engineers working out in Pewaukee for a seven-county commission that includes rural Walworth and Ozaukee Counties, and anti-Milwaukee Waukesha County, to get us on their suburban-oriented agendas, or to give our needs their input and approval.

Take a look at the website for SANDAG - - San Diego's one-county planning commission.

Compare it to SEWRPC's mid-90's website: You decide which site looks like it wants you to get into the issues, participate and move a public-spirited agenda forward.

Unlike SEWRPC, which takes Milwaukee's money but doesn't give it representation on the commission board, SANDAG even gives San Diego's Mayor a seat right at the table!

Imagine that.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

Development (sic) Has Destroyed The Chesapeake Bay's Blue Crabs

People who are blase about the risks to the Great Lakes only need look at the continuing trashing of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

The Bay and its signature blue crabs are dying.

I grew up not far from the Maryland Eastern shore, and I can tell you, what's happened to the Bay is criminal.

Legislators' Conservation Scorecard Released: Special "Dishonor" Mention for New Berlin's Mary Lazich

The Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters has released a comprehensive scorecard for legislators' performance in the just-concluded session.

State Sen. Mary Lazich, (R-New Berlin) wins a"dishonor" explanaatory mention separate from the posted charts for having continuing to vote against the Great Lakes Compact.

The final bill was a compromise supported even by Republican legislative leaders and the Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce.

As has been pointed out often on this blog, Lazich was so tightly entwined with a fringe, property-rights anti-Compact movement in Ohio that she put wacky ideology over the interests of her own home city constituents and long-term Great Lakes sustainability.

New Berlin has submitted the first application for a Lake Michigan diversion allowable under the Compact: had Lazich's position prevailed, New Berlin's application, now pending, would not have been able to move forward in the review process.

Greg Kowalski puts it into perspective, here.

Nice Tribute To Former Madison Alderwoman Betty Smith

Doug Moe, late of the Capital Times and now at the State Journal, has written a nice tribute to former Madison alderwoman and Council President Betty Smith as she turns 90.

The council is a non-partisan body, of course; Betty was an open-minded, progressive Republican, and you don't see too many people like that in today's political world.

Happy Birthday, and long life, to Alderwoman Smith.

Reports Show Little Improvement Since 1996 In SEWRPC Minority Hiring

In the two-paragraph "overview" of the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission's 1996-1997 Affirmative Action plan - - the first such plan that SEWRPC says it produced - - the agency twice uses the phrase "action-oriented program" to describe what it has in mind.

Using SEWRPC affirmative action reports and other documents, it would be hard after more than a decade to describe those efforts as "action-oriented," or successful.

SEWRPC divides its staff among three categories: professional, technical and clerical.

Bottom line:

Of 66 full-time positions at the agency, there is one African-American female in the clerical category, one Asian, Pacific Island male in the professional category, and one Hispanic male, one Hispanic female and one Hispanic female in the technical division.

Five of 66.

And though its seven-county territory includes heavy minority populations in the cities of Milwaukee and Racine, SEWRPC, year-in-and-year-out has hired consistently few minority employees, yet has reported few solutions to self-reported "problem areas," results from affirmative action plans or meeting trend-setting goals, according to a review of SEWRPC affirmative action plans dating to 1996.

These reports are not online.

SEWRPC was created by state statute in 1960, and is comprised of Milwaukee, Waukesha, Washington, Ozaukee, Walworth, Racine and Kenosha Counties.

Additionally, there are identical or nearly identical sections and language in both the 1996-1997 document and the current, 2007-2008 plan (the 2008-2009 report is not yet available).

This suggests that the reports, with hiring data changes and other tweaks added annually, appear to be produced from templates and texts from previous years' reports, and are not dynamic annual action plans looking forward to bold goals, or reacting to poor minority hiring records with innovative solutions.

The 1996-1997 plan's Equal Employment Opportunity Policy statement was signed by then-director Kurt Bauer, the agency's first lead manager.

The 2007-2008 statement was signed by Philip Evenson, Bauer's replacement and only the agency's second executive director.

Bauer is still employed by SEWRPC as a three-quarters' time consultant as executive director emeritus, records show.

SEWRPC is headquartered in the City of Pewaukee, in Western Waukesha County.

The 1996-1997 report indicates that among its 41 professional staffers - - civil engineers, surveyors, architects, planners and other relatively specialized jobs - - there was one minority, an Asian, Pacific Islander female.

One minority of 41 professionals.

Eleven years later, the 2007-2008 report indicates that of 42 professional staffers, there was still but one minority, an Asian, Pacific Islander male.

One minority of 42 professionals - - keeping the minority statistic in the professional ranks at a steady 2%, a percentage that is insignificant, but yet manages at two to bizarrely double the actual, even more paltry raw number of one.

The 1996-1997 report shows no minority members on a 10-person clerical staff; in 2007-2008, there was a slight improvement. One minority staffer had been hired, an African-American female, among eight clerical employees.

In the technical category - - comprising draftsmen, research aides, office equipment operators and others - - this was the breakdown:

In 1996-1997, there were four minorities - - two African-American males and two American Indian females - - on a 46-member technical staff.

In 2007-2008, on a smaller, 30-person technical staff, the report says there were seven minority staffers - - at first glance suggesting a significant percentage and raw number increase in minority hiring.

But wait: Those numbers do not tell the complete story, because the reports do not differentiate between full-time and part-time employees.

In response to a follow-up question, SEWRPC indicated of the seven minority technical staffers in the 2007-2008 report, four were part-time, and only three were full-time - - one Hispanic male, one Hispanic female and one American Indian female.

None of the technical staff minorities in full-time positions were African-American, though the four minority part-time technical staffer were all African-American, SEWRPC says.

Therefore, of 66 full-time employees at SEWRPC in the 2007-2008 affirmative action report, there are actually just five minority employees at the agency - - the aforementioned, three technical staffers, the one professionals and the one clerical employee, the sole SEWRPC African-American fullitime SEWRPC staffer - - for an agency-wide, minority full-time staff level of 7.5%.

You can decide if that is an Affirmative Action success for a public agency in the greater Milwaukee area. My conclusion is at the end.

Other interesting similarities between the current year report and the first one dating back to 1996-1997:

Both contain nearly identical lists of about three dozen media, educational and community organizations to which SEWRPC says it sends job notices as part of its minority outreach action.

The only difference is that Milwaukee central city radio station WNOV was dropped from the list after the 2006-2007 report, records show.

A minority summer internship program is referenced in the 2007-2008 report as one way SEWRPC can help place minority planning and engineering students at the agency.

But the report does not repeat earlier references to a proposed public-partnership, and steering committee, to create up to 50 additional intern positions "if at least ten organizations participated," according to reports from 2001-2002 through 2005-2006.

All the SEWRPC annual affirmative action reports beginning with the 1996-1997 document cite transit deficiencies as a real or potential barrier to minority employee hiring at the agency.

Yet citing problems with parking that were affecting staff recruiting, SEWRPC purchased office space farther west from its former downtown Waukesha headquarters- - where there were some transit connections- - to the more distant Pewaukee office park location that is not on a bus line.
It made the relocation even though SEWRPC acknowledged in its 1996-1997 affirmative action report's "problem areas" section that "the time and expense of commuting to downtown Waukesha is a major disincentive to potential job applicants from Milwaukee, Racine and Kenosha Counties..."

But parking problems was an issue that SEWRPC affirmatively resolved with its move from downtown Waukesha to the smaller, more isolated and whiter City of Pewaukee.

The documentation: SEWRPC's Executive Committee minutes from 2/24/00, pps. 3-4, (not online), where the committee endorsed the making of an offer to purchase the Pewaukee office building:

"The discussion also included concerns about the existing Commission offices [in the Waukesha County Historical Society], including lack of parking and the inefficient layout of the current quarters, with a special concern being expressed on the probable detrimental effect on staff recruitment.".

But the resulting relocation by SEWRPC to Pewaukee made the transit disconnect and commuting distance even worse for the agency's Milwaukee, Kenosha and Racine employees and applicants.

That lack of transit service and farther location to the west was not a sufficient reason for SEWRPC to either remain in downtown Waukesha, or to find new offices, if they they were truly needed, that were closer to the region's urban core.

So here we are in 2008, with SEWRPC, a 100% taxpayer-financed public agency that provides transportation, housing, water supply, land-use and other crucial planning services to that part of Wisconsin with the largest number of minorities - - but it can't do better than finding one minority professional for its full-time staff of 66, and has but four other full-time minority employees.

If you keep urban people off the payroll, and certainly off the all-white senior staff that SEWRPC also acknowledged did not have a single City of Milwaukee resident, it should come as no surprise that SEWRPC has been following a pro-suburban, highway-building policy agenda, too.

I've been arguing on this blog and in Milwaukee newspaper op-eds and one in Waukessha, too, that SEWRPC is a bad deal for Milwaukee, a city that sent SEWRPC $400,000 in operating money this year, has no representative on the SEWRPC 21-member governing board, and whose minority residents can barely break the color barriers on the SEWRPC staff.

I believe Milwaukee needs to withdraw from SEWRPC and either create a new, urban-focused planning commission in the region with other cities, or handle its share of the region's planning tasks in house, with its planning, transportation, public works and housing staffs.

After reading through the agency's Affirmative Action reports, and seeing little that has been successfully affirmative, or action-oriented, I renew my argument here, and rest my case.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Memo To The State Patrol

Officers, and your local counterparts:

You are leaving a lot of revenue on the table, and leaving highway workers exposed to needless risks, too, by the lack of enforcement into and through construction zones from State Highway 164 in Western Waukesha County on I-94 through the Marquette Interchange.

Individual knuckleheads that still race along that stretch in excess of the posted speed limits - - dropping in spots to 45 mph - - continue to drive that way with their menacing selfishness because there's no visible speed enforcement.

I was through that corridor today, in both directions, and saw only one law enforcement vehicle with its flashers on the shoulder, and that officer appeared to be assisting a motorist with a mechanical problem.

That's certainly a correct action, but the speeding that is going from Waukesha through the Marquette Interchange is ridiculous.

If you drive the speed limit in that corridor, you won't see any traffic enforcement, but you will get a ton of dirty looks and shaken fists from motorists who think it is their God-given right to drive at 70 mph or above even with "road construction ahead" signs and orange barrels everywhere.

WisDOT is running some heart-tugging "slow down" TV commercials aimed at motorists who zoom through construction zones.

Some ticket-writing would provide a bigger safety net than some TV spots for the workers out there as the idiots scream by.

Change Is Everywhere - - Except In Highway Planning

Huge layoffs and aircraft mothballing at Midwest Airlines.

Even faster production cessation at the General Motors truck plant in Janesville.

Tract and subdivision homes losing value quicker and deeper than city or older, inner-ring suburban properties.

Spiking fuel costs are making economic waves and changing behaviors everywhere - - except in the offices of public sector agencies that plan highways and have power over transportation improvements and investments.

At the Wisconsin Department of Transportation, and the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission, planners, designers and engineers continue to propose and execute highway construction projects as if gasoline still cost about half what it actually costs today.

WisDOT is forging ahead with a $1.9 billion bells-and-whistles rebuilding and expansion of I-94 from south Milwaukee to the Illinois state line.

It is using a plan recommended by SEWRPC in 2003 that used traffic projections based on gasoline costing $2.30-a-gallon, with a predicted 3% annual increase, putting it today at $2.51-a-gallon.

[I was at SEWRPC today: regular gas at the Mobil station just south of the offices there at the intersection of State highway 164 and I-94 costs $4.299-a-gallon]

The same SEWRPC-written, WisDOT-implemented plan also contains another $3.8 billion in spending throughout the SEWRPC seven-county region on more freeway rebuilding and added lanes, with a half-billion ticketed in 2012 for the Zoo Interchange west of Milwaukee.

SEWRPC's plan calls for adding 127 miles of new lanes, but did not include any rail components.

Taking its cues from SEWRPC, and incorporating its own historic disdain for any passenger rail except the federally-subsidized Amtrak system, WisDOT did choose to add them - - even though a commuter rail initiative from Milwaukee to Racine to Kenosha, parallel to the freeway segment being widened in that corridor, sits on a shelf after many years of study.

Plenty of people have worked on the commuter rail plan in good faith. That's not the problem.

It's that road-building signals coming from the top are still the priority and direction.

I know a person pretty high up in the Minnesota Department of Transportation - - the WisDOT equivalent just to our northwest - - and that person said when Jesse Ventura was elected Minnesota Governor, the law was laid down:

We're Building Light Rail In The Twin Cities, Now!

The agency was redirected from the top to get it done, and the Hiawatha system is up and running, and breaking all ridership projections.

In our largest urban area, we do not have these choices - - because our political leaders and their opinion-maker partners deny them to us.

While Governor, Tommy Thompson and then-Waukesha County Executive Dan Finley toadying to anti-city interests fomented by right-wing talk radio, blocked and vetoed light rail.

The Waukesha Freeman as we speak opposes Waukesha County even joining a regional transportation authority to rationalize area-wide transportation services because it believes it would be too much of a benefit to the City of Milwaukee.

Our bus system in Milwaukee is dying, rail is stalled, but billions are about to be spent on wider highways, with fancier exit ramps, as driving is declining.

It's a collective state and regional failure, being played out with our tax dollars, on behalf of a dying paradigm in which road contractors and their political allies are the winners at society's expense.

Cousins Center, Open Space Preserved By Cardinal Stritch University

It appears that Cardinal Stritch University may save the Cousins Center properties in St. Francis that could have fallen to developers and bulldozers.

This would be welcome news on several fronts, not the least of which is the preservation of more than 40 acres near the lakefront.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Bush Fake "Initiative" On Offshore Oil Drilling Means Nothing

Pres. Bush's executive order on offshore oil drilling means nothing, as federal law and strong opposition by Republican politicians in Florida and California still stand in the way.

W's father, George H.W. Bush signed the original ban on offshore drilling, and brother Jeb, as Florida Governor, stood with Dad on the issue.

There's A Winner In SEWRPC Renaming Search

Not long ago, the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission paid a public relations firm to craft a new name and logo - - ideas that went nowhere but, presumably, into paid invoices.

Details here, thanks to fellow blogger Gretchen Schuldt.

However, through serendipity and clever writing elsewhere, I think we have a winner in that name-game contest, but let me back up a bit, and explain:

I saw this headline - - "District lines may not be representative" - - on a Sunday Journal Sentinel column and I got giddy thinking someone else was seeing the light about SEWRPC's setup and was willing to take a few brickbats about undermining regional cooperation.

SEWRPC is made up of seven counties, some of which have less people than a handful of Milwaukee aldermanic districts, but the commission setup mandates no City of Milwaukee representation, and so on.

Then I read the first few lines of the column and all I could imagine was Julia Taylor over at the Greater Milwaukee Committee (context and links, here) pounding out a letter to the editor about these heresies:

"Dreamers and planners like to pretend the whole metropolitan area is just one, big, blissfully happy family.

"We’re not.

"The city has about as much in common with the suburbs, oftentimes, as a perch has with a pickle."

Writing like that is apt to make some people's hair catch fire or fall out.

Now, in fairness, I need to say that the column by Mike Nichols was not, after all, about SEWRPC, though Mike has beaten the drums pretty loudly for Germantown to remove itself from the regional technical college system, MATC, (he calls it the Milwaukee Area Taxing College), so there are times when he can find fault with these unrepresentative regional/taxing bodies.

Anyway: Mike's column was an analysis of the 8th State Senate District race between incumbent Republican Alberta Darling, from River Hills, and challenger Sheldon Wasserman, the Democratic State Representative from Milwaukee.

The District contains strongly Democratic and Republican territories.

SEWRPC, made up of Kenosha, Racine, Milwaukee, Washington, Ozaukee, Waukesha and Walworth Counties, was created by the state legislature in 1960.

But its name is so clunky, and identity so opaque, that SEWRPC paid a public relations firm with tax dollars to suggest a new name.

The suggestion - - Regional Planning Commission of Southeastern Wisconsin - - mercifully, was never implemented, but I think Nichols has provided an inspiration that SEWRPC can have for free:

The Perch and Pickle Planning Commission, or PPPC.

Doesn't that say it all about our so-called region, with a nice alliteration thrown in as a jargon-busting bonus?

I have been to countless meetings where people do not know what the acronym "SEWRPC" stands for, or what it does.

They confuse it with the sewerage commission (MMSD) or a political action committee (PAC).

It can even be confused with a political action committee representing sewage treatment companies.

SEWRPC is, simply, a publicly-financed planning and taxing district that has a distinctly-suburban orientation, but one where Milwaukee has no role in its governance - - except to fork over a few hundred thousand dollars in property tax dollars every year that gets spent against its interests.

The commission has avoided writing a regional study about affordable housing, with problem solving recommendations, since 1975 - - but has helped the state build more freeways across the region without equivalent transit.

That leaves hemmed-in city workers fewer transportation options to get to jobs that followed development on open land, and to fewer housing options also in the sprawling suburbs, too.

Can you say "Pabst Farms," for example?

On paper, the commission 'represents' Walworth County farmers, villages like Racine County's Elmwood Park (pop. 474), lakefront estate owners in Waukesha County's (and the state's) most upscale village of Chenequa (pop. 583) - - plus low-income trailer park occupants and hundreds of thousands of renters in Milwaukee, Racine and Kenosha of many colors and who speak many languages.

That diversity has no representation in SEWRPC thinking, daily management, commission direction, or in the makeup of nearly the entire agency's staff.

Nichols column reminds us that every resident has an equal voice in deciding who will represent them in the politically and economically-fragmented 8th District.

That's not the case at SEWRPC's Pewaukee headquarters, where an absence of representation on the commission's board, may I say, keeps Milwaukee in a powerless pickle.

And if I can extend Nichols' metaphor (as his former editor at the Milwaukee Journal, I feel I have the right to butcher his copy one more time), where the suburbs run things from their very comfortable Western Waukesha County perch.

The one that is not even on a bus line.

That's why I suggested in a June 8th Journal Sentinel Crossroads op-ed that Milwaukee, either the city, county, or both, withdraw from SEWRPC and use the hundreds of thousands of property tax dollars they transfer annually to SEWRPC, er, the PPPC, and establish an urban-friendly planning commission.

It can have a simple name that underscores what it does and where it is:

The Milwaukee-Area Planning Commission.