If you understand what an "analogy" is you would understand that he was not comparing Pres. Obama to Hitler - just like he was not comparing Boehner to Netanyahu. The comparison was "a form of reasoning in which one thing is inferred to be similar to another thing in a certain respect, on the basis of the known similarity between the things in other respects." This comparison was the meeting itself-not the people at the meeting. If he had used the analogy of Mother Theresa meeting with Pol Pot I suppose you would have equated Obama with the latter. Convenient comparisons.
Lets see, the lefty loon Rosie O'Donnel, wants rich people beheaded, Al Sharpton calls New York Hymie town, do I need to go on?
ReplyDeleteAs I've said here often, take these cases on their own. Conflation is not an argument that carries any weight.
ReplyDeleteAnd you've confused Al Sharpton with Jesse Jackson, so you need to take a closer look at these matters.
If you understand what an "analogy" is you would understand that he was not comparing Pres. Obama to Hitler - just like he was not comparing Boehner to Netanyahu. The comparison was "a form of reasoning in which one thing is inferred to be similar to another thing in a certain respect, on the basis of the known similarity between the things in other respects." This comparison was the meeting itself-not the people at the meeting. If he had used the analogy of Mother Theresa meeting with Pol Pot I suppose you would have equated Obama with the latter. Convenient comparisons.
ReplyDelete