"Would you really want to read 10-15 comments on an article that state exactly what you believe?"
Patti--That's why Reagans Disciple haunts The Political Environment blog--because 10-15 comments on an article that state exactly what [he] you believe[s] are exactly what he'd get on conservatives blog. That's why progressives don't go to those blogs much. It's always the same: liberals will raise your taxes, we can't afford it, Obama caused the whatever to fail, blah, blah, blah, zzzzzzz. . . . He comes here to annoy us becuz he's bored over there.
And don't buy that "vigorous debate" argument, either. Reagan just throws out a few snarky comments. He doesn't debate squat.
...yes because Gilbert and Charles have a lot in common with the average WI democrat or republican.
ReplyDeleteI heard his opinion really resonates with the De Pere Burger King crowd. Oh wait, that was 15 years ago.
In other non news stories....
why do people come here merely to disagree?
ReplyDelete@Patti; Great question.
ReplyDeleteRandian plastics factory owners are much closer to the zeitgeist.
ReplyDelete@Patti,
ReplyDeleteDebate is good for the process.
James is gracious enough to post opposing comments. Would you really want to read 10-15 comments on an article that state exactly what you believe?
"Would you really want to read 10-15 comments on an article that state exactly what you believe?"
ReplyDeletePatti--That's why Reagans Disciple haunts The Political Environment blog--because 10-15 comments on an article that state exactly what [he] you believe[s] are exactly what he'd get on conservatives blog. That's why progressives don't go to those blogs much. It's always the same: liberals will raise your taxes, we can't afford it, Obama caused the whatever to fail, blah, blah, blah, zzzzzzz. . . . He comes here to annoy us becuz he's bored over there.
And don't buy that "vigorous debate" argument, either. Reagan just throws out a few snarky comments. He doesn't debate squat.
Boxer,
ReplyDeleteNot true. Please join the debate on "Loophole Louis" I'm waiting for some responses on "Collective Liability" from Thomas v. Mallett.
So far there have not been any insightful comments made, rather just the "snarky" ones to which you refer.