1. How is noting that RK has better-than-average insurance coverage for her recent diagnosis and treatment "turn(ing)Kleefisch's colon cancer against her."? James only points out that R's like her (and Johnson and Walker, etc.) rail against the evils of Obamacare and run on platforms of overturning it legislatively or defunding it, when they and their families do not have to face a tough diagnosis of cancer or other disease knowing that to pay for treatment may well bankrupt their families.
2. Kleefisch herself was the one that called her disease diagnosis to everyone's attention--via TV news. Seems to me that she's going for the sympathy vote and is perfectly willing to use her colon cancer to achieve it.
3. No one has started or plans to start a rumor that she is dying--that's a figment of your paranoia. (And Sheldon Wasserman did not start that rumor about Alberta Darling in 2008. You didn't even get Alberta's name right which says a lot about your accuracy in general. ) YOU are the one that first brought up "rumors that she is dying" in this blog.
4. Shame on you, Anonymous, for projecting your own dirty campaign hallucinations onto James. He has way too much power over you, man. Better stay off his blog or your head will explode into a thousand liberals with funding.
5. Did you even read the linked material? Go ahead, I dare you. It doesn't say anything that you think it said. And you might learn something.
Perhaps if Scott Walker is elected Guv, and Mrs. Kleefisch then becomes Lt. Guv, she'll donate her health care coverage to a needy fellow Wisconsinite, as she'll continue to be well-covered by her husband's policy.
Was wondering how long it would take for your side to turn Kleefisch's colon cancer against her.
ReplyDeleteApparently it was only one day.
What's next, rumors that she is dying like your side tried against Roberta Darling in 2008?
To quote you James "shame on you".
Anonymous:
ReplyDelete1. How is noting that RK has better-than-average insurance coverage for her recent diagnosis and treatment "turn(ing)Kleefisch's colon cancer against her."? James only points out that R's like her (and Johnson and Walker, etc.) rail against the evils of Obamacare and run on platforms of overturning it legislatively or defunding it, when they and their families do not have to face a tough diagnosis
of cancer or other disease knowing that to pay for treatment may well bankrupt their families.
2. Kleefisch herself was the one that called her disease diagnosis to everyone's attention--via TV news. Seems to me that she's going for the sympathy vote and is perfectly willing to use her colon cancer to achieve it.
3. No one has started or plans to start a rumor that she is dying--that's a figment of your paranoia. (And Sheldon Wasserman did not start that rumor about Alberta Darling in 2008. You didn't even get Alberta's name right which says a lot about your accuracy in general. ) YOU are the one that first brought up "rumors that she is dying" in this blog.
4. Shame on you, Anonymous, for projecting your own dirty campaign hallucinations onto James. He has way too much power over you, man. Better stay off his blog or your head will explode into a thousand liberals with funding.
5. Did you even read the linked material? Go ahead, I dare you. It doesn't say anything that you think it said. And you might learn something.
As to Ms. Kleefisch: She was the one who introduced a political analysis of her health care treatment into the discussion:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.wrn.com/2010/10/kleefisch-slams-obamacare/
Perhaps if Scott Walker is elected Guv, and Mrs. Kleefisch then becomes Lt. Guv, she'll donate her health care coverage to a needy fellow Wisconsinite, as she'll continue to be well-covered by her husband's policy.
ReplyDeleteIn many organizations, organizations are cutting money from their salary so as to give the health coverage, and that would be great thing for them.
ReplyDelete