The Lake Michigan diversion application drafted by Waukesha relies, in part, on SEWRPC draft diversion recommendations whose adoption in the near future are a foregone conclusion:
SEWRPC and Waukesha have had a neat little tag team going these last few years, as each backs the other's parallel work (Waukesha's water utility manager, Daniel Duchniak, remains a forceful member of the SEWRPC's advisory committee that is drafting the agency's regional water supply plan.)
[Well, here we are at 11:15 p.m. on Sunday night, August 22nd, and the SEWRPC web page set up for the task force still says, as it has all week, that there are no meetings scheduled.]
But I see that SEWRPC, while not scheduling the 9/2 meeting, had gone ahead and scheduled a separate meeting this coming Tuesday, 8/24 for its water supply advisory committee to take up the task force work.
The water policy advisory group is the one that SEWRPC treats like a real advisory committee - - while the justice task force is on the receiving end of
SEWRPC's long history of indifference to criticism and transparency.
So I again asked SEWRPC what was happening, and was it not putting the cart before the horse having the advisory committee meet prior to the task force and consider the task force work?
At first I got no reply, so I re-sent my query also to Ken Yunker, SEWRPC's Executive Director - - after which i got a response from Gary Korb, the SEWRPC outreach manager who had not answered my first email.
Since I said I would post any and all responses, I'll do so below with the entire exchange - - but note that while a question about the task meeting was addressed, there was no answer to the larger question of how it is that the task force work could be on another committee's agenda when the task force work was not completed, and not completed in an open meeting?
[Update Monday: SEWRPC provides an answer about the water committee scheduling, but, again, no explanation about whether the justice task force work is considered done. This is like pulling teeth. I will put that Monday email exchange with the earlier one, below.]
An agency that is 100% financed by taxpayers, and which was basically forced by federal monitors and civil rights activists to create the justice task force, is not doing itself or the public any favors by becoming obtuse and opaque when public policies and procedures are at stake.
Better outreach and connections to the region's under-represented, minority and disadvantaged communities are supposed to be SEWRPC priorities, according to both the agency's 2004 and 2008 evaluations by the feds.
This entire episode tells me SEWRPC's compliance and commitment to environmental justice are charades.
[For the record, here we are at 8:25 p.m. on Monday night, August 23rd, and the task force meeting is not yet scheduled. So clearly the water committee meeting, which is Tuesday at 9:30 A.M. is SEWRPC's priority. As for the justice task force, that pesky thorn in SEWRPC's side - - it can wait.]
The email exchanges:
Jim,
Ken asked that I respond to you. I have not had time to look at your blog posting, but plans are moving ahead for the September 2nd meeting. The Task Force has been reminded of this next regular meeting date, as also noted during the July 8th meeting, but an agenda has not yet been distributed. An agenda will probably be distributed within the next several days.
Sincerely,
Gary Korb
Regional Planning Educator
UW-Extension working with SEWRPC
262-547-6721
gkorb@sewrpc.org
From: James Rowen [mailto:jer45y@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 11:14 AM
To: Yunker, Kenneth R.
Cc: Korb, Gary K.
Subject: Fw: I put this up today, Gary
Hi, Ken;
Can you answer the question I posed in this blog posting and that is based on an earlier email from Gary about the EJTF meeting of 9/2- - basically why the EJTF meeting of 9/2 has yet to be scheduled, but an 8/24 meeting of the water supply advisory committee has been scheduled, with an agenda item to approve the SEI that the EJTF still has under discussion?
I have not heard back from Gary on this matter.
Thank you. James Rowen
--- On Thu, 8/19/10, James Rowen wrote:
From: James Rowen
Subject: I put this up today, Gary
To: "Gary K. Korb"
Date: Thursday, August 19, 2010, 12:06 PM
http://thepoliticalenvironment.blogspot.com/2010/08/is-sewrpc-bypassing-its-justice-task.html
I'll post any response from the agency. James Rowen
Monday email exchange:
The water committee meeting was set and materials mailed before members of the EJTF requested an additional EJTF meeting to discuss the UWM-CED report. The water committee will be informed of the additional EJTF meeting to be held.
Sincerely,
Gary Korb Regional Planning Educator UW-Extension working with SEWRPC 262-547-6721 gkorb@sewrpc.org
From: James Rowen [mailto:jer45y@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, August 20, 2010 12:46 PM
To: Korb, Gary K.
Subject: RE: I put this up today, Gary Thank you, Gary. Can you also address the question of why or how the water advisory committee can be taking up the SEI from the EJTF on August 24th prior to the EJTF finishing its work on 9/2? For want of a better phrase, isn't that putting the cart before the horse? James Rowen |
|
|
|
I see this person Gary Korb works for the University of Wisconsin Extension office. Are we, the public, sure we can trust Mr. Korb’s response when he seems to provide a response that SEWRPC controls. From what I can tell based on Mr. Korb's responses in this post and previous posts I've seen over the years where Mr. Korbs responds to you from time to time, it seems he looks outs only for the interest of SEWRPC. I don't know, maybe he does not recognize his bias in his replies to you. Does Mr. Korb work out of SEWRPC's office? I would suspect by reading Mr. Korb's responses that he does not represent the mission of his own organization. A quick search found that the mission he should support "extends the knowledge and resources of the University of Wisconsin to people where they live and work."
ReplyDeletePerhaps you should ask this Mr. Korb for his job description. He'll play defense with you; stand up to people like him because this guy Ken Yunker should NOT be asking Mr. Korb to respond to you. First of all, Mr. Yunker needs to get some courage to have his own staff respond to you Jim. Second, the only people Mr. Korb should be working with is his own manager. And who is that manager that oversees Mr. Korb's work? That's a question that is not being answered on here. Because I would suspect if the University of Wisconsin Extension monitored these so-called objective responses from Mr. Korb, Mr. Korb might be out of job by now...
I have no beef with Gary Korb. He's a very capable guy in a completely-top-down organization, with a strong Executive Director and a passive board of commissioners.
ReplyDeleteAs to the task force: I have a lot of respect for that group of volunteers. They had to fight to be heard within SEWRPC, but they still do not elect their own chair - - that person, a commissioner, was selected and assigned by SEWRPC.
If you prowl through the SEWRPC website...www.sewrpc.org...you will see that the clout rests with staff and SEWRPC's four standing committees.
Then advisory committees - - often insiders from the worlds of transportation, public works, engineering, and academe, with overlap among committees.
Then you have the justice force is a separate, lower rung on the ladder.
So I tip may hat to these volunteers and I salute their effort in a really difficult environment.
Typos and word drops:
ReplyDeleteWord dropped in my second-to-last prahp:
"justice task force."
Typos - - I "tip my hat." Not may.