Waukesha officials have gotten behind the Lake Michigan option in part because they say, at $164 million, it's less expensive than alternatives - - which the new data supports.
And because it's a boon, not a negative, to the environment.
The new information is included in a revision to the draft application that is included in the version to be debated by the Council Thursday night.
The source of a new water supply for Waukesha, and whether the Lake Michigan diversion option is the best for Waukesha, the region, the Great Lakes and the environment, have been key issues in the city's Mayoral race.
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources and the other seven Great Lakes states will review the environmental issues with independent analyses.
Not timely enough!
ReplyDeleteJeff Scrima: 58%
Larry Nelson: 42%
Unfortunately for him, former Mayor Larry Nelson chose to make his entire race all about the water issue and pushing forward with an application for Lake Michigan water before it was ready.
Was today's race a referendum on the water issue? You betcha!