Thursday, March 14, 2013

New Lane Needed To Cut Marquette Interchange Crowding; So Soon?

It was just a few years ago that the $810 million Marquette Interchange project to 'modernize' the layout and reduce congestion in its spaghetti of bridges and highways was said to be completed on time and under budget - - but the redesign and the rebuild in the Interchange just west of Downtown caused so much fresh congestion that a paralyzing halt to fix the Big Fix is now underway as WisDOT squeezes in an "auxiliary lane" west of downtown to unclog the westward flow.

This fresh round of construction-related congestion, as well as what passes for 'norma'l for commuters between downtown Milwaukee and the burbs to the west - - rain or shine, every day, with longer waits on Brewer home game days - - could have been mitigated if a weak Gov. Tommy Thompson, right-wing talk radio and Waukesha's anti-urban politicians hadn't killed planning that Thompson had once backed for modern light rail lines running parallel to the crowded I-94 corridor.

Light rail was not only in the plan - - Tommy even moved it onto a quicker timetable when he came to former Milwaukee Mayor John Norquist's office to promote it, along with DOA Secretary Jim Klauser and more WisDOT suits than you'd see in a month's Men's Warehouse commercials - - only to back down when talk radio started snarling and Waukesha County Executive Dan Finley said "no."

And kept saying "no" after Waukesha was dropped from the plan - - dooming residents here and there to decades more I-94 congestion, regardless of new lanes and other so-called improvements.

Light rail lines would have extended into the Third Ward, the Menomonee Valley, Miler Park, the Medical Complex, the County Zoo and the expanding research park and UW-M Engineering school on the County Grounds - - a complex right in the heart of the Zoo Interchange expansion and rebuild that is 50%+ more expensive than the Marquette Interchange project.

The opponents to light rail cloaked their political objections in specious and insincere fiscal arguments - - as if highway construction, maintenance, plowing, land-striping, patrolling and auxiliary add-on-lanes  - - come for free. 

Together the Zoo and Marquette Interchange projects will cost taxpayers more than $2.1 billion  - - without a dime spent on transit improvements of any kind.

And let's not forget the cost of replacing one failed brand new ramp not long after the Marquette re-opened - - and though the contractor bore the cost, I'm sure taxpayers somewhere absorbed that cost somehow down the line.

Some 'freeways.'

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Walker Budget May Take Over Baraboo Circus Museum

Am hearing there is some sort of reverse privatization and state takeover of Circus World Museum in Walker's budget - - the Museum is on state land, but is run by a private non-profit foundation - - that is designed to channel Museum revenues to the state.

Am checking...

Some details, here:

Gov. Scott Walker recently unveiled a budget plan that includes rolling Circus World — whose property is state-owned but whose operations are funded privately — into the Historical Society. This would include making Circus World’s staffers state employees; funneling the site’s revenue into state coffers; and ending a lease agreement between the state and the Circus World Museum Foundation, Inc., which has operated the museum for 54 years...

Circus World leaders characterize the Historical Society’s plan as a cash grab. Circus World attracted 71,000 visitors in 2012, easily the most among state historic sites. The museum cleared $318,000 in 2011.

“They view us as the single largest revenue coming to the gate of all their sites, and they want it for themselves,” [Executive Director Steve] Freese said.

Walker’s proposed two-year budget, which requires Assembly and Senate approval, calls for spending $1.2 million to pay 10 Circus World employees. Meanwhile, projected revenues of about $2.4 million — from admissions, donations and other sources — would go to the Historical Society.

Health And Water Issues In Kewaunee County

Wisconsin corporate leader and former Milwaukee Sentinel business editor John Torinus suggests on his blog that GTAC mining and opponents to the open pit iron ore mine that new state legislation is enabling near Ashland should work together with regulators on collaborative environmental solutions.

He cites some productive examples, including "the corporate dairy farming industry."

I'm not trying to pick a fight with John. I am reader of his blog, have cited it previously - - one example, here - - and respect his writing publicly.

I note his reference to the dairy industry because in Kewanuee County, where these massive operations - - called CAFO's by some and animal factories by others - - are concentrated there is an active, clean water grassroots organization, Kewaunee CARES, that has identified a need for stronger DNR regulation and industry practices to stop the pollution of land and water resources through current manure disposal methods.

I have been remiss in staying up-to-date on water issues raised by big dairies - - an example from Rosendale, here - - but will pay more attention to what is going on in places like Kewaunee - - where there at least 15 such operations - - and Door Counties, too.


Why Is Wisconsin Picking Iron Ore Over Paper?

Good question, as posed by Denny Caneff, Executive Director of River Alliance of Wisconsin, in a Journal Sentinel op-ed Monday:

The "experts" might say Wisconsin's paper industry is beyond salvation. But a concerted effort for paper, by the same people who insist we need an iron mine, seems so much more sensible than trying to ram an iron mine down the throats of citizens, many of whom oppose it.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Preparing For Asian Carp - - Through Back Door Rivers

We've all heard that the Asian carp will penetrate the Great Lakes through the Chicago shipping canal, but it's likely they will come into Wisconsin from the upper Mississippi River, and that possibility - - actively being studied for action - - in Minnesota - - is the subject of two upcoming events sponsored by the River Alliance of Wisconsin and several partners:

Wisconsin Asian Carp Summit on Friday, March 15th - - registration closing tonight: 
http://events.constantcontact.com/register/event?llr=iyryr7dab&oeidk=a07e6v4qa40f8916a6e 
On April 3rd, the River Alliance will be hosting a brief webinar to summarize the Friday discussion.
This webinar will be recorded and available for anyone who is interested to watch at their leisure.  See the link below for more information.  
River Alliance Asian Carp Webinar on April 3rd:
 http://events.constantcontact.com/register/event?llr=iyryr7dab&oeidk=a07e7566vxe0e95755e-- 

What's In A Name, Exurban Waukesha County?

Former Milwaukee Mayor John Norquist noted when showing his infamous slide show/power point about cities, development and sprawl that things get named for what's no longer there after paving and bulldozing in the name of progress.

So I couldn't resist shooting a few quick shots of that phenomenon today when I was out Waukesha way, where subdivisions abound on former farmland and dairies are closing:



Parts Of Act 10 Still Unenforceable, Appeals Court Rules

The State Supreme Court will ultimately look at the constitutional issues involved, but a unanimous Appeals Court today found that portions of Act 10 remain on hold:

The state Court of Appeals on Tuesday kept in place - at least for now - a lower court's ruling that found parts of Gov. Scott Walker's union law was unconstitutional. 
The ruling means that for now portions of the law cannot be enforced. 


Monday, March 11, 2013

With Wisc. A Rogue Great Lakes State, Whither Waukesha's Diversion?

Scott Walker, his donor friends at the Florida-based GTAC coal mining company and their allies are trying to sell as environmentally-friendly their partisan plan to blow up and bulldoze hills, fill wetlands and threaten the Great Lakes' largest wild rice-growing estuaries in pursuit of a massive open pit mine near the southern shore of Lake Superior.

In Phase I - - 4.5 miles long, a half-mile wide and 1,000 ft. deep - - after 1,200 ft. hills are evaporated. Possible final length - - 22 miles. With lots of lakes, streams and rivers in the way and downstream.

Imagine how this recklessness looks to citizens, policy-makers and regulators across seven more water-rich Great Lakes states. All these watersheds, from Minnesota to New York State are connected, you know.

This historic disrespect for water - - remember, the Bad River near the proposed mine's many miles drains into Lake Superior - - cannot help Walker and his DNR convince the other states in the Great Lakes basin - - or Canadian provincial observers, with First Nations (tribes) among them - - that Waukesha's Great Lakes diversion application is on solid scientific footing and had a fair and depoliticized review.

And that Wisconsin right now is a reliable Great Lakes steward and trust-worthy partner in regional water quality and conservation - - the heart of the Great Lakes Compact under which Waukesha's application will be reviewed.

Walker and his party pushed the bill into law at the expense of water science and fair regard for long-held treaty rights to water and resources belonging to the Bad River Ojibwe band and its water-based, rice-growing culture.

If the mining bill is Walker's idea of resource responsibility, if it's the new Wisconsin model plan and process for water quality and management, with Waukesha's Great Lakes diversion application still on hold:

Yipes!

And the Waukesha application to divert water out of the Great Lakes basin has its own share of internal and regional problems.

It's been three years in the making and is not yet complete. Nor has the DNR yet released even a draft environmental statement covering the withdrawal plan and return flow scheme.

With public hearings, in-state challenges and who knows how many rewrites to come.

And then all eight Great Lakes states must approve the application: the mining bill and the obnoxious process that made it law will not help move that application forward.

And will not move forward Wisconsin's once-proud reputation as a leader in environmental preservation, and respect for water protection enshrined in the Wisconsin Constitution as The Public Trust Doctrine - - a set of principles dating to the Northwest Ordnance of 1787.

At which the mining bill, Walker and his allies thumbed their noses.

Waukesha's legislators pushed hard for the mining bill. They may find push-back from the other states whose unanimous consent is needed to approve the Waukesha diversion application among the many unanticipated consequences of their anti-scientific, disrespectful and partisan process that ended Walker's bill-signings Monday.

And which has many chapters, like the Waukesha application, yet to unfold.

As Predicted, Walker Says Mining Bill Protects Environment

I wrote this over the weekend about the spin that Scott Walker would put on massive open pit mining his #1 legislative priority would wreak, through weakened public participation and legal exemptions, on Northern Wisconsin land and water:

Gov. Walker will sign the mining bill Monday afternoon at manufacturing companies in Rhinelander and Milwaukee.

He will tout the bill and open-pit iron ore mining as environmentally-friendly, law-abiding, treaty-respecting and job-creating.
Nothing could be farther from the truth.
Early reports about the mining bill signing are indeed carrying Walker's misleading quotes:
"I'm thrilled to sign legislation into law protecting environmental safeguards, while providing certainty to the mine permitting process," Walker said in a statement released by his office.
He said lawmakers made "substantial changes" to the legislation designed to protect natural resources.
"The bill I signed into law today will preserve our tradition of clean land, water, and air," Walker said.
And, by the way, that bogus claim about "substantial changes" to the legislation to protect natural resources is a direct bob-and-weave around the Journal Sentinel's Sunday editorial that said the partisan and one-sided defeat of all such amendments to the bill by the GOP was a part of the reason Walker should have vetoed it:
Republicans could have found a more solid middle ground on which to stand. They could have accepted some of the dozens of amendments to the measure that Democrats offered up Thursday. They could have done more to ensure that mining companies won't dodge state standards through exemptions allowed by the law.

On Feb. 24, we wrote that the mining bill, after some compromises had been reached in committee action, was headed in the right direction. It was. But then it stopped moving. No improvements were made in the Joint Finance Committee or on the floors of the Assembly and Senate. We urged Republicans to work with Democrats on further compromise. They did not. The vote in the Assembly was strictly along party lines, and reasonable amendments were rejected by Republicans time and again Thursday.

As it stands, the bill isn't as good as its supporters claim or as bad as its critics fear. But it's not good enough, which is reason enough for Gov. Scott Walker to veto it, although we have little hope of that happening.
More about the editorial, here.

And the real science and law involved and ignored by Walker, here.

Scott Walker Reaps Milwaukee Design Credit For Activists' Ideas

Gov. Walker gets to star at the announcement on the lakefront today about reconfiguring I-794, the Hoan Bridge and Clybourn St. to free up land for development, but Milwaukee politicos and activists had been pushing this for years, according to this Urban Milwaukee 2009 report:

Alderman Robert Bauman, who represents downtown Milwaukee and the north end of the bridge, recently issued a press release that details how the city will likely position itself on the issues with the Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT).
The release indicates positions we have advocated for before, including the need for the bridge to better interact with the city at its northern terminus at Clybourn and Lincoln Memorial Drive.
More from 2010, here:
Wisconsin Congresswoman Gwen Moore and Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett want the Wisconsin Department of Transportation to begin the process of re-decking the Hoan bridge. They also want state officials to look at the feasibility of new ramps at both ends of the bridge. 

The Republican Who Missed Romney's 47% Tape...

Who may run for President - - and they say he's the smart one in the family: 

Jeb Bush: Obama won reelection by ‘dividing the country’

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Why Paul Ryan Will Never Be President

Proposing the ending of Obamacare is an instant loser. See: election 2012, outcome.

A Reporting Suggestion For Wisconsin Media

How about a version of this New York Times feature?
The Gun Report: March 9, 2013




And my answer to the Times' question of the day - - how many people did you know who were killed by a gun - -  is two (changed from the original "one").

On The Mining Bill, Where The Middle Is A Muddle

I put the Journal Sentinel's Sunday middle-ground mining editorial into context on the paper's Purple Wisconsin site, and add my own take from this blog site on what Walker will not say tomorrow afternoon when he signs at appearances in Rhinelander and Milwaukee mining equipment makers the contemptuously bad, destructive and self-destructing mining bill.

Saturday, March 9, 2013

What Scott Walker Will Not Say At Mining Bill Signings

Gov. Walker will sign the mining bill Monday afternoon at manufacturing companies in Rhinelander and Milwaukee.

He will tout the bill and open-pit iron ore mining as environmentally-friendly, law-abiding, treaty-respecting and job-creating.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

The mining bill establishes a privileged class of iron mining corporations (allowed to write and edit legislation behind closed doors) with special rights in Wisconsin (more about special classes and rights at the end of this posting).

The bill lets GTAC  - - a West Virginia mountain-top removal business with no experience in iron mining:

* Dynamite the Penokee Hills, tear apart the Bad River region and fill portions of its watershed with a gigantic open-pit mine.

* Set the stage for the release of sulphuric acid mining drainage upstream from culturally-significant wild-rice estuaries while exempting the company from having to protect public water rights.

* Evade long-standing Constitutional guarantees, reasonable regulation or meaningful public participation in the state permitting review.

* Pay no mining taxes.

And while other firms must pay a fee of $7 per ton for waste generated, GTAC will be required to cough up less than three cents per ton towards remediation funding or other public programs though the open-pit mine 1,000 feet deep, a half-mile wide and up to 22 miles long is projected to generate tens of millions of cubic yards of waste rock annually.

For 35 years.

To solemnly say that iron mines will be required by the bill to follow the law when the bill intentionally guts or displaces the law is a sick, Soviet-style rhetorical dodge.

As to much-needed jobs in Wisconsin and the economically-depressed Northwestern part of the state - - in an economy Walker artificially depressed through Act 10 austerity - - other than a few company surveyor and geologist hours at the site committed until injuctions hit, no actual mining jobs are created by the bill now, or for a long time to come.

And given the multiplicity of complex litigation headed our way because the bill is so badly flawed there will be no miners or truck drivers or machinists or manufacturers hired for many years, if ever.

In fact, GOP bill managers turned aside a Democratic amendment to require GTAC to hire Wisconsin workers, leaving the firm free to bring in its own, out-of-state work force.

All of which Walker knows as his remarks are being drafted and vetted by public and private spinmeisters alike.

So let's tell the truth:

The bill makes no immediate or predictable dent in state or regional unemployment.

If Walker really had cared about these issues beyond making empty boasts about creating 250,000 new private sector jobs, and blathering on in talkingpointspeak about "certainty" and "flexibility" he would have come into office two years ago with a blueprint for northern Wisconsin employment beyond the mining bill.

He would have laid out a process and goals with everyone at the table - - including the Native tribes his party has excluded from the mining bill's drafting.

And, by the way: what is the negative effect on recreation and tourism jobs created by preliminary logging, road-building and then finally the blasting, air pollution and run-off from a massive open-pit mine carved into the Bad River headwaters and throughout Lake Superior watersheds?

Which brings us to the treaties signed by the United States Government with the Chippewa (Ojibwe) in the 19th century:

The bill simply pretends the treaties are not there. Call it legislating with Windex, regardless if Walker invokes them with a few throw-away lines that have no honesty behind them.

The bill, from drafting to adoption to signing, is a deliberate stick in the eye, a stab in the heart, by the worst elements in the majority culture which already obtained and run the current State of Wisconsin with its vast timber, water and real estate wealth - - just as they run the country and much of North America from sea to shining sea - - by a mixture of violence, coercion, and trickery and a handful of treaties often disrespected or broken.

A majority culture with all the power, but which now wants every last molecule of land, breath of clean air, moment of quietude and grain of rice, regardless of treaty promises made, from the Bad River Band living on a remaining narrow strip of its lands on the south shore of Lake Superior.

On behalf of an out-of-state coal mining company, Walker wants to control and devalue that, too.

In other words, the private-sector obeisant Walkerites running the government want everything, and will do anything, say anything, contort anything, to devalue and effectively take that, too.

Shame on me for further distributing the anonymous toxin that flows as comments into this blog, but someone on this posting Friday summed up the ignorance and bad intentions to which Walker and his exclusionist legislative allies have been playing:

The battle that is brewing is that over treaty rights issues and the Walker administration is eager and willing to tear into this with the same energy and expertise. By the time this is over there will no longer be a privileged class of people with special rights above those of the rest of us.
The writer of that comment overlooks and turns upside down which people in Wisconsin were made special by having full legal rights through business as usual, and who did not:

*  Native Americans had their land stolen repeatedly, were shoved on to reservations, were not granted US citizenship until 1924 or the guaranteed right to vote in all states until 1957.

*  African-Americans were declared by the US Constitution having representational rights equal to three-fifths of whites.

*  Women in the United States were not granted the right to vote until 1920.

So spare me the empty rhetoric about rights, the law, and the environment - - whether from the Governor or the Internet trolls who carry his water.

Who Is Redrawing Waukesha's Water Service Map

The water and border wars between the City and Town of Waukesha had led the Town recently to withhold most of its acreage from possible future Lake Michigan water service by the City - - service that the Town had not requested.

The City is unhappy with the Town's decision - - likely meaning fewer City-connected customers down the road and thus the need to seek less Lake Michigan water - - though the City is looking to annex 128 Town acres anyway to make sure raw land set aside for school construction could get City services if need be , as the Journal Sentinel reports.

How, you ask, is this service territory question so fouled up?

Turns out that the regional planning commission, (SEWRPC), had put nearly all of the Town almost five years ago in the City's future water supply map - - without telling the Town  - - at the time the City was drafting its as-yet-completed-and approved application to divert Lake Michigan water.

SEWPRC said the Town was in and on the map, the City said OK, and only then did the Town find out.

No hearings. No notices. Nothing. Direction by fiat, and I don't mean in little Italian cars.

Some way to make policy and deal with residents, their property and an entire municipality, let alone Great Lakes water policy that eventually will need eight states to say, 'hey - - we like your style.'

What I find interesting about this long, tedious and seemingly-endless water diversion application drafting and policy-making is that the City's communications with SEWRPC about first drawing the map, and then the redrawing now years later years later to meet the Town's 'get-us-mostly-out' position were and continue to be carried out between two unelected officials:

The water utility manager, Daniel Duchniak, and SEWRPC's Executive Director, Ken Yunker.

Yunker and Duchniak are engineers and agency managers who report to appointed commissions - - SEWRPC has 21 unelected commissioners from seven southeastern Wisconsin counties, and Waukesha's Water Utility Commission has seven members - -  five citizens, plus one aldermen and the Waukesha mayor.

You'd think that an elected body or representative would be signing such communications and thereby signing off on the local and regional economic, development and public policy implications involved.

Not to mention the further impacts on the course of the City of Waukesha's contentious, precedent-setting application under the legal strictures of the eight-state Great Lakes Compact to divert water outside of the Great Lakes basin and return it perhaps through waterways running through other communities, such as Brookfield, Wauwatosa, Milwaukee and Racine.

Accountability really rests with elected officials, but their role in the drawing and now redrawing of the water service map, and thus the establishment of the amount of Great Lakes water sought  - - key components of a diversion application that ultimately must be approved by all eight Great Lakes states - -is hard to spot at this juncture.

Because unelected bureaucrats are in control.


Legal Expert Explains Treaty Rights Ignored By Pro-Mine Legislators

A must-read.

Wisconsin's new mining law attaches no importance to the treaties. When it considers the company's application to mine the Penokee Hills, the state Department of Natural Resources may conclude that it can ignore the resulting diminishment of Chippewa usufructuary rights and the potential adverse impacts on the waters of the Bad River reservation.

But the mine will also require the approval of the United States Army Corps of Engineers, and the tribe will have the right to sue in federal court to challenge any permit issued. In these federal forums, the solemn promises that the United States made to the tribe 1842 and 1854 will matter.

Friday, March 8, 2013

Why Walker Is Signing Mining Bill Far From The Penokees

I'd posted the other day that PR types in Walker's office and elsewhere would recommend he sign the mining bill creating open-pit desecration of Northern Wisconsin water-rich land far from the scene of the crime.

Today we learn there are to be two signings Monday far from the Penokees - - in Milwaukee, a seven-hour drive from the mining site, but close to where a Caterpillar mining equipment firm official had recently had doubted the bill will create Milwaukee jobs might be singing a new tune - - and in Rhinelander. 

As best as I can 'determine,' a signing is in Rhinelander because the name of the City contains the word "land."

Or maybe Walker will suggest that paper workers there being thrown out of work by a New York hedge fund taking over and shutting down the mills can move to Ashland and land a mining job in five-to-ten years. Maybe.

Details, here.

Update: the Milwaukee signing is at P&H, a Joy Global unit, not at Caterpillar.

WisDOT Says There Has Been No Ghost Blogging

A couple of weeks ago, citing records of a WisDOT meeting about the Zoo Interchange, I wrote this post about ghost/anonymous blogging:

Thursday, February 21, 2013

WisDOT Record Raises Questions About Agency "Ghost" Blogging, Monitoring
In the tradition of government communications speaking for themselves through publication in media outlets like the old I. F. Stone Weekly, or in the The Washington Monthly "Memo of the Month," I offer quotes from the minutes of a Zoo Interchange planning meeting at the Wisconsin Department of Transportation SE Regional office in Waukesha on July 16, 2008...
MEETING NOTES No. 00002
DATE and TIME: 7/16/2008 at 1:00PM SUBJECT: PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MEETING...
WEB BLOGS AND WEBSITES
Emlynn [Grisar]is looking for a new policy informing how and when to respond to blogs regarding the Zoo IC project. Is a ghost blog (anonymous blog) a good way to handle this, this has been done in the past. Also, how often are we monitoring? She is looking for advisement from the Office of Public Affairs (OPA)
I also added this comment from a WisDOT spokesmam, Michael Pyritz;
"I'm completely unaware of anything like that being done on any project," he said, and WisDOT agreed to check further.
WisDOT spokewoman Peg Schmidt subsequently told me by phone that WisDOT did not use anonymous or ghost blogging, and that it would violate WisDOT policy to do so.

In an email earlier this week, Schmidt said:
When we spoke via the phone last week, I indicated that we do not believe there are records responsive to your February 22, 2013, record request below. The use of ghost or anonymous blog comments is not a department practice.
 
I indicated that I would provide a written response that detailed the extent of the WisDOT search for records in response to your request. I explained that the search would be restricted to records in the possession of Emlynn Grisar and the Office of Public Affairs. This search for records included:
·        Emlynn and I reviewed personal files relating to all records of web sites, blogs and articles.
·        Emlynn and I reviewed personal e-mail and sent items for records relating to web sites, blogs, articles. Emlynn also reviewed personal e-mail and sent items for responses to constituents.
·        I reviewed meeting minutes from coordination meetings and conference calls with all region communication staff during 2008.
·        Emlynn reviewed meeting minutes before and after the July 16, 2008 meeting noted in your request (minutes from June 19, 2008 to August 12, 2009).
 
I am providing a copy of conference call notes from August 6, 2008, where an item notes, “blogs/websites – continue to use discretion on whether to respond to correct misinformation on sites.”
I’m providing this because it confirms my recollection that in 2008 there was discussion related to the need to respond to blogs as we often had to take steps to get unblocked to access sites.
 
Emlynn previously provided a copy of our most recent Transportation Administrative Manual (TAM) 112 policy where it is noted that Internet users “may not conceal their identities or misrepresent someone else by any means.” With this email, I am also providing a copy of the TAM 301 policy on social media where it is noted that “all authorized social media sites must be identified as official department sites through the use of the department name or acronym or approved department, campaign or project logos.”
If you need anything further on this let me know.
 
Peg Schmitt – Office of Public Affairs

Notable Wisconsin/Walker Firsts And Lasts

While we lead the nation in the number of governors' legal defense funds financed by fat cat donors, we're dead last in percentage change in job growth among all 50 states, with an actual decline of 15,900 jobs since January, 2011 - - better known as the Scott Walker era - -  the Capital Times reports:

The job statistics have taken on political significance in Wisconsin following Gov. Scott Walker's well-publicized vow to add 250,000 jobs to the state total during his four years in office.

To track that progress, The Capital Times has created a new database that will be updated on a monthly basis as new figures are released.