tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post7612009387636808931..comments2023-10-08T04:12:46.273-05:00Comments on The Political Environment: Sykes On Gingrich: No...And Then SomeJames Rowenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-68724944694553549432012-01-23T18:02:33.121-06:002012-01-23T18:02:33.121-06:00I'm surprised that Sykes isn't attracted b...I'm surprised that Sykes isn't attracted by Gingrich's race baiting because that's what Sykes does best.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-35993305010519533272012-01-23T16:25:17.208-06:002012-01-23T16:25:17.208-06:00I'd guess between Dec. 15 - - Jan. 15.I'd guess between Dec. 15 - - Jan. 15.James Rowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-90352067504644241392012-01-23T15:53:55.060-06:002012-01-23T15:53:55.060-06:00James,
Do you know about when it was? I would be...James,<br /><br />Do you know about when it was? I would be interested in finding / listening to it as well.<br /><br />Thanks,Reagan's Disciplenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-25463608891693980092012-01-23T14:35:54.159-06:002012-01-23T14:35:54.159-06:00Speaking of ghost writers- who is RJ's?Speaking of ghost writers- who is RJ's?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-82882353485596738062012-01-23T12:50:03.004-06:002012-01-23T12:50:03.004-06:00My point was and is that Sykes has a valuable stor...My point was and is that Sykes has a valuable story to tell and I hope he repeats it. I could go digging into the podcast history, I suppose...James Rowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-86841973344611800002012-01-23T11:59:23.381-06:002012-01-23T11:59:23.381-06:00Ah, I thought this might be a case where Cholly ta...Ah, I thought this might be a case where Cholly takes a logical position and recognizes Gingrich for the vile bomb-thrower he is. Instead Cholly's rationale essentially is that Newt is not (to use Newt's own pronunciation) "conservateeve" enough. Newt is tainted because (dear God!) there have been times he agreed with liberals. In short, he is too moderate. Holy cripes, Cholly is loonier than I thought. Oh, correction, Cholly is merely doing his usual job of pandering to the wacko fringe; he has no actual principles.<br /><br />Then comes the question: If Gingrich is too moderate, then Romney isn't? Who on earth does this guy actually support?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com