tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post6755293874360469647..comments2023-10-08T04:12:46.273-05:00Comments on The Political Environment: If it's January, it must be Wisconsin wetland filing timeJames Rowenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-79358484993621673342017-01-12T21:20:25.097-06:002017-01-12T21:20:25.097-06:00I DEMAND YOU REMOVE MY POST ABOVE!
Dan Bice is EX...I DEMAND YOU REMOVE MY POST ABOVE!<br /><br />Dan Bice is EXACTLY the person I was refering too, but with Walker-esque disinformation, you are proclaiming to the world that I should be THANKING HIM!<br /><br />You have no more credibility than the people at MJS and WSJ, but we all know why -- they are your buddies.<br /><br />YOU HAVE CREATED PROPAGANDA WITH A MISLEADING AND FALSE REPLY TO MY POST. Sorry, all respect for you and the sentiment expressed above is NULL AND VOID.<br /><br />And by leaving it up when you have been directly told you have entirely misrepresented the post which I carefully wrote to avoid you believing it was a personal attack into PRO-BICE shilling.<br /><br />SHAME ON YOU!<br /><br />Do you have the journalistic integrity to address this or at least delete the comment that you are misrepresenting?!?!?!?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-18566863672264909992017-01-12T19:05:41.945-06:002017-01-12T19:05:41.945-06:00Appreciate the support, but acknowledge the strong...Appreciate the support, but acknowledge the strong environmental work by Lee Bergquist and solid all-around reporting by Dan Bice and Dave Umhoefer, among others.James Rowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-29893543445356412032017-01-12T18:26:46.775-06:002017-01-12T18:26:46.775-06:00What I don't understand is that the editors/ma...What I don't understand is that the editors/management of one of the major news organizations in Wisconsin actively promotes a reporter as being all-about important "watchdog" work. But this reporter (and I am sure it is not fully-this reporter's decision) is only featured with relatively unimportant stuff and usually things that highlight personality conflicts instead of substance.<br /><br />There are many important issues including the ecological stuff/water protection that appears to an issue Mr. Rowen is passionate about and reports on in-detail. No one solely following any of the state's mainstream media would have an informed perspective on these issues.<br /><br />And the sad thing is, if people are not informed or are only seeing occasional stories that then get buried by the prevalence of other stores, are making up their minds about these important issues without facts and perhaps are even just following fake news that they may find via social media or other sources that have an agenda.<br /><br />Your environmental reports often do link back to mainstream reports, but I am sure even people following those sources are not seeing the importance of your presentation, because it is only reported on in a spotty manner anywhere else.<br /><br />I do not know how we can work to overcome the obvious media bias (how they weigh stories by how often they are covered and in what manner) that screeches across Wisconsin, though there was a time when the public was willing to take economic action. This means withholding the "vote" we have that we know is counted -- our money.<br /><br />While Rush Limbaugh is still on the air, boycotts were extremely successful in pulling the rug out from under this right-wing mouthpiece and his "ditto-heads". Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com