tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post4737409050235298231..comments2023-10-08T04:12:46.273-05:00Comments on The Political Environment: Alberta Darling Double-Talks Herself Into Stewardship Program Self-ParodyJames Rowenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-17769729260787832182011-05-20T11:01:09.525-05:002011-05-20T11:01:09.525-05:00I am not sure. I see this provision:
Further, sp...I am not sure. I see this provision: <br /><br />Further, specify that, for any proposed acquisition using stewardship funds within 30 days of receiving notice, each city, village, town, or county may adopt a nonbinding resolution that supports or opposes the proposed acquisition of land if any portion of the land is located in the city, village, town, or county and require DNR to consider a resolution if one is adopted before approving or denying the grant or acquisition.James Rowenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10203270946492159686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6621691715090523319.post-63191233380812648592011-05-20T08:25:21.502-05:002011-05-20T08:25:21.502-05:00My understanding is the Walker budget makes it muc...My understanding is the Walker budget makes it much harder to actually spend Stewardship Fund money. Purchases require approval by the local tax jurisdiction and the state is barred from giving that jurisdiction money to replace the lost tax revenue, so in these times such purchases would rarely be approved locally. Is this still true?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com