The DNR really screwed-up the process by allowing the hearings to transpire deliberately knowing they can't possibly assess an impact without a know discharge point or the annual gallons withdraw without a defined service area.
Eight other state DNR directors are laughing in unison.
Thanks Ald. Murphy!
ReplyDeleteWould have been nice to hold them in Waukesha, the actual applicant for the diversion. Carrol College could have hosted the hearing.
ReplyDeleteDo you think this is a politically bias intention?
Nah, Waukesha's Common Council formed it negotiating team without any elected officials representing it's citizens to "keep the politics out".
To Anony: The DNR may have felt it needed to hold these on neutral ground, but there was no need. Close is sometimes not good enough.
ReplyDeleteIn the end, will it really matter?
ReplyDeleteThe DNR really screwed-up the process by allowing the hearings to transpire deliberately knowing they can't possibly assess an impact without a know discharge point or the annual gallons withdraw without a defined service area.
Eight other state DNR directors are laughing in unison.