Friday, December 5, 2008

Case For Regional Transit Inches Forward, Though Problems Remain

Business leaders in Racine, Kenosha and Milwaukee made their pitch at a Thursday Public Policy forum gathering for a financed regional transit authority, commuter rail and dedicated county sales tax scheme for transit operations of up to five cents on the dollar.

The push for a three-county regional solution (Milwaukee, Racine, Kenosha) comes as Milwaukee County's bus system is getting closer to complete implosion, trapped by County Executive Scott Walker's disdain for transit, and by the escalating political and fiscal impossibility of using regressive property tax dollars to run it.

So it's looking more and more as if some sort of fix is coming from the State Capitol in the form of county/regional sales taxes and a new transit agency's taxing authority, but there are still problems with the scheme, ranging from the desire of the City of Milwaukee for a piggy-backed fractional sales tax for public safety to political opposition by Milwaukee County Board Chairman Lee Holloway.

And let's not forget that talk radio is waiting in the wings to pounce, since it considers taxes, rails and the freer movement of people throughout the region toxic. For the talkers, a regional transit authority funded by new sales taxes - - even if they are paired with a reduction in property taxes - - is porterhouse tosed to hungry wolves.

But the threat of a shutdown of the County bus system will probably result in some sort of a fix, and if a regional transit authority can be structured and operated equitably, the new system could also include the long-stalled Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee commuter line, too, since the KRM has growing support from development-minded business leaders and transit advocates.

And these are the people who will have to take on talk radio, a negative force which has already spooked Waukesha County to remove itself from the three-county RTA.

Take a bow, Waukesha: any further lobbying from you on behalf of regional cooperation should be laughed out of the room, perhaps along with your Lake Michigan water diversion plans.

Unstated at the Thursday session: the political obstacle that could be added unnecessarily to all this political work if the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission is handed a management or governance role in the operation of an RTA.

The agency is already seen as overtly pro-highway-and-suburban, unrepresentative of urban interests and hopelessly disconnected from taxpayers.

A SEWRPC role in future RTA operations would be a stake through the heart for transit progress in the region.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

No to KRM!!
NO to any more taxes or raising taxes!
Short haul trains do not work to move people.

We have just begun to fight we only need to stop this until 2010 when the GOP takes bake congress (that is if Obama will allow free elections)

James Rowen said...

Some facts for you, here:
http://www.sewisrta.org/pdfs/rta_fact_sheets.pdf

Anonymous said...

Hitler said if you tell a big lie often it becomes truth.
Your link is proof of that

Anonymous said...

Could the young pony be kind enough to share thoughts on what will work to move people or state some reasoned economic development solutions that would preclude the NEED to move people?

Also, I would be curious to discover the identity of the rest of the herd referred to as, "we," in your comments that you seem to be self-appointed spokesperson for.

Not being a citizen of the KRM region, my interest in this system and following how it is being considered is to hopefully promote future commuter rail connections to other regions of the state that would both contribute to and benefit from a larger network.

Can I safely assume that you (and the herd) have some extreme paranoia about a perceived problem with the coming Obama administration? State it and maybe someone will ease your fears.

In some sense we have had periods of a half-"baked" GOP Congress recently. I don't see a huge desire from electors to do it again soon.

James Rowen said...

To Colt: The Hitler analogy is a bit over the top, don't you think?